oral squamous cell carcinoma
Conditions
Brief summary
Compare surgical outcome in terms of margin status between the intervention cohort and the standard of care cohort
Detailed description
Determining diagnostic parameters (including predictive values, sensitivity, specificity, type I & II errors) of fluorescence imaging for identifying inadequate tumor margins., Implementation of an intraoperative feedback workflow between the pathology department and surgery team on the margin assessment by FI., Retrospective comparison between standard fluorescence imaging devices and a novel technique using dual aperture fluorescence imaging as an exploratory objective.
Interventions
DRUGCETUXIMAB
Sponsors
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Compare surgical outcome in terms of margin status between the intervention cohort and the standard of care cohort | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Determining diagnostic parameters (including predictive values, sensitivity, specificity, type I & II errors) of fluorescence imaging for identifying inadequate tumor margins., Implementation of an intraoperative feedback workflow between the pathology department and surgery team on the margin assessment by FI., Retrospective comparison between standard fluorescence imaging devices and a novel technique using dual aperture fluorescence imaging as an exploratory objective. | — |
Countries
Netherlands
Outcome results
None listed