Low-risk renal transplant patients
Conditions
Brief summary
Efficacy: proportion of patients with CMV disease (incidence) at 6 and 12 months after transplantation., Safety: proportion of patients with different degrees of neutropenia at 6 and 12 months after transplantation.
Detailed description
Safety: number of days with valganciclovir (at 6 and 12 months post-transplant) and proportion of patients with adverse events occurring at a frequency >10% (at 6 months post-transplant)., Efficacy/safety: CMV disease/neutropenia combination assessed at 6 and 12 months using DOOR ("Desirability of Outcome Ranking"). The best outcome is no CMV disease/replication without neutropenia (<1500 mm³), while the worst is CMV disease/replication with neutropenia. DOOR ranks patient outcomes and estimates the probability of a better result in one group. A >50% probability, with 95% confidence intervals excluding 50%, indicates a significantly better outcome.
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Efficacy: proportion of patients with CMV disease (incidence) at 6 and 12 months after transplantation., Safety: proportion of patients with different degrees of neutropenia at 6 and 12 months after transplantation. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Safety: number of days with valganciclovir (at 6 and 12 months post-transplant) and proportion of patients with adverse events occurring at a frequency >10% (at 6 months post-transplant)., Efficacy/safety: CMV disease/neutropenia combination assessed at 6 and 12 months using DOOR ("Desirability of Outcome Ranking"). The best outcome is no CMV disease/replication without neutropenia (<1500 mm³), while the worst is CMV disease/replication with neutropenia. DOOR ranks patient outcomes and estimates the probability of a better result in one group. A >50% probability, with 95% confidence intervals excluding 50%, indicates a significantly better outcome. | — |
Countries
Spain