Skip to content

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of DUOFAG® in bacterial infection treatment in patients with surgical wounds

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2024-518307-22-01
Acronym
DUO2022_01
Enrollment
52
Registered
2024-12-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical wound infection/dehiscence caused by S. aureus and/or P. aeruginosa colonization

Brief summary

For Cohort 1: The endpoint will be the frequency of all (local and systemic) reactions with suspected or confirmed relation to IMP., For pooled Cohorts 1 & 2: Time to commencement of healing. The commencement of healing is defined as the composite measure when both the following conditions must be true: the granulation process in the wound has started, as indicated by the score ≤ 2 in each of the 3 items A8 – A10 of the mLUMT scale, the S. aureus and/or P. aeruginosa infection has been eradicated, i.e., the swab sample is negative on both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.

Detailed description

Safety endpoints: The frequency of the following symptoms following the IMP application will be evaluated: • local reactions (local rash onset, local sensations, worsening of local inflammatory signs, discharge) • systemic reactions (vital signs reactions, fever, rash, arthralgia, gastrointestinal symptoms)., Microbiological endpoints: Change of the microbiological profile of the wound assessed by swab (maximum 8 assessment points)., Clinical efficacy endpoints: mLUMT total score change since Baseline; Time since the start of the study treatment until the bacterial infection eradication – i. e. the swab sample is negative on S. aureus and/or P. aeruginosa; Time since the start of the study treatment until the granulation process in the wound has started, as indicated by the score ≤ 2 in all 3 items A8 – A10 of the mLUMT scale; Time since the start of the study treatment until the wound is closed as assessed by Investigator.

Interventions

Sponsors

MB PHARMA s.r.o.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
For Cohort 1: The endpoint will be the frequency of all (local and systemic) reactions with suspected or confirmed relation to IMP., For pooled Cohorts 1 & 2: Time to commencement of healing. The commencement of healing is defined as the composite measure when both the following conditions must be true: the granulation process in the wound has started, as indicated by the score ≤ 2 in each of the 3 items A8 – A10 of the mLUMT scale, the S. aureus and/or P. aeruginosa infection has been eradicated, i.e., the swab sample is negative on both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Safety endpoints: The frequency of the following symptoms following the IMP application will be evaluated: • local reactions (local rash onset, local sensations, worsening of local inflammatory signs, discharge) • systemic reactions (vital signs reactions, fever, rash, arthralgia, gastrointestinal symptoms)., Microbiological endpoints: Change of the microbiological profile of the wound assessed by swab (maximum 8 assessment points)., Clinical efficacy endpoints: mLUMT total score change since Baseline; Time since the start of the study treatment until the bacterial infection eradication – i. e. the swab sample is negative on S. aureus and/or P. aeruginosa; Time since the start of the study treatment until the granulation process in the wound has started, as indicated by the score ≤ 2 in all 3 items A8 – A10 of the mLUMT scale; Time since the start of the study treatment until the wound is closed as assessed by Investigator.

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026