Skip to content

Lithium versus cariprazine in the acute phase treatment of bipolar depression: a pragmatic head-to-head open, randomized multicenter study. The 9th study of the Danish University Antidepressant Group (DUAG 9)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2024-517170-20-01
Enrollment
122
Registered
2024-10-02
Start date
2022-12-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive episode in bipolar disorder

Brief summary

investigate whether cariprazine is superior to lithium or vice versa in the acute treatment of patients with bipolar type 1 or 2 in a current depressive episode measured as change on the Hamilton Depression Scale, 6 item version, HDS-6.

Detailed description

Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: Hamilton Depression Scale, 17 item version, HDS-17. (Values 0- 52, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences (baseline to 8 weeks) in HDS-6 for the PP 8 population., Between-groups difference in proportion of responders and remitters at week 4 and 8 in HDS-6 scores., Between-groups difference in proportion of responders and remitters with response and remission defined by HDS-6 score without clinical relevant manic symptoms (MAS <7) at planned or premature endpoint., Between-groups difference in the proportion of patients with 'acceptable wellbeing', defined as the subject reporting ≥50 on the WHO-5 questionnaire at endpoint. WHO-five Well-being Index, WHO-5, Between-groups difference in the proportion of patients with 'acceptable wellbeing', defined as the subject reporting ≥50 on the WHO-5 questionnaire at endpoint. WHO-five Well-being Index, WHO-5., Between-groups difference in "(switch to mania or hypomania) / (response) -ratio", defined as the number of subjects switching to mania or hypomania (as defined above) divided by the total number of responders, including those responders switching to mania., Between-group differences in reason for and time to all cause treatment discontinuation (lack of effect, lack of tolerability, lost to follow-up, or other cause)., Between-group difference in treatment compliance. Treatment compliance is defined as the proportion of received treatments out of the planned until drop-out or end of study., Between-group difference for the ITT population in reasons for premature discontinuation., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: MAS Bech-Rafaelsens Mania scale .(Values 0- 44, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: MES Bech-Rafaelsens Melancholia scale, MES .(Values 0- 44, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: MADRS Montgomery-Aaberg Depression Rating Scale, MADRS .(Values 0- 60, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures:YMRS Young Mania Rating Scale, YMRS .(Values 0- 60, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures:ASRM-14 Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale-14, .(Values 0- 56, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures:MDI Major Depression Inventory, MDI (Values 0- 58, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: WHO-5 questionnaire., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: SCIP Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry, SCIP (Values 0- 64+, higher scores mean a better outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: COBRA Cognitive complaints in bipolar disorder Ratings assessment, COBRA, (Values 0- 48, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: FAST Functioning Assessment Short Test, FAST (Values 0 - 72, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures:PSQI PIttsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI (Values 0 - 21, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: CGI-S Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity, CGI-S (Values 1 -7, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures:CGI-I Clinical Global Impression Scale - Global Improvement CGI- I (Values 1 -7, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: C-SSRS Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, C-SSRS (Values 1 - 5, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: accumulated benzodiazepine dose as diazepam equivalents (DSKP)., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: for time to all-causes discontinuation., Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: all-causes study endpoint., Between-group difference for the ITT population in reasons for time to all cause discontinuation., Between-group difference for the ITT population in reasons for treatment expectation., Between-group difference for the ITT population in reasons for adverse events., Between-group difference for the ITT population in reasons for serious adverse events.

Interventions

Sponsors

Aalborg University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
investigate whether cariprazine is superior to lithium or vice versa in the acute treatment of patients with bipolar type 1 or 2 in a current depressive episode measured as change on the Hamilton Depression Scale, 6 item version, HDS-6.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference-in-differences for secondary continuous measures: Hamilton Depression Scale, 17 item version, HDS-17. (Values 0- 52, higher scores mean a worse outcome)., Difference-in-differences (baseline to 8 weeks) in HDS-6 for the PP 8 population., Between-groups difference in proportion of responders and remitters at week 4 and 8 in HDS-6 scores., Between-groups difference in proportion of responders and remitters with response and remission defined by HDS-6 score without clinical relevant manic symptoms (MAS <7) at planned or premature endpoint., Between-groups difference in the proportion of patients with 'acceptable wellbeing', defined as the subject reporting ≥50 on the WHO-5 questionnaire at endpoint. WHO-five Well-being Index, WHO-5, Between-groups difference in the proportion of patients with 'acceptable wellbeing', defined as the subject reporting ≥50 on the WHO-5 questionnaire at endpoint. WHO-five Well-being Index, WHO-5., Between-groups difference in "(switch to mania or hy

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026