Ovarian cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
Progression-free survival (PFS) arm A versus C.
Detailed description
PFS arm B versus arm C, Assessment of PROs, PFS assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR), Efficacy according to stratification factors, Efficacy according to PD-L1 status, Overall survival (OS), Time to first subsequent therapy (TFST), Subsequent progression (PFS2), Time to second subsequent therapy (TSST), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Safety analysis., Exploratory endpoint: Evaluation of changes in genetic, molecular, and immunological markers of response and/or resistance over time., Exploratory endpoint: Correlation between changes in genetic, molecular, and immunological markers and efficacy in defined subgroups.
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Progression-free survival (PFS) arm A versus C. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| PFS arm B versus arm C, Assessment of PROs, PFS assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR), Efficacy according to stratification factors, Efficacy according to PD-L1 status, Overall survival (OS), Time to first subsequent therapy (TFST), Subsequent progression (PFS2), Time to second subsequent therapy (TSST), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Safety analysis., Exploratory endpoint: Evaluation of changes in genetic, molecular, and immunological markers of response and/or resistance over time., Exploratory endpoint: Correlation between changes in genetic, molecular, and immunological markers and efficacy in defined subgroups. | — |
Countries
Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden