Skip to content

Controlled clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of MYRRHINIL-INTEST® versus placebo in patients with diarrhoea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) and patients with mixed-type irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-M)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2024-514892-16-00
Acronym
Repha_1436
Enrollment
268
Registered
2024-10-02
Start date
2020-05-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diarrhoea predominant irritable bowel syndrome

Brief summary

Efficacy is assessed by a responder criterion, which is specified differently for patients with IBS-D and IBS-M. For both subgroups, a response of the abdominal pain is required (NRS pain): IBS-D patients: additional assessment of stool consistency stool consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale). IBS-M patients: additionally an overall assessment of the change in bowel health using the PGI-I scale is also required.

Detailed description

Abdominal pain (NRS pain, measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale, pain intensity 0 – 10), daily entry in the patient diary, assessed during visits 1-5 at the study center, Number of spontaneous bowel movements, daily entries by the patient in the patient diary, Stool consistency on individual days measured using the Bristol Stool Form Scale, daily entry in the patient diary, assessed during visits 1-5 at the study center, Frequency of the feeling of incomplete bowel evacuation, daily entries by the patient in the patient diary, Occurrence of mucus and/or blood in the stool on individual days, daily entry in the patient diary, assessed during visits 1-5 at the study center, Assessment of the severity of IBS-D or IBS-M symptoms using the IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) during visits 1-5 (visit assessment: completed by the patient), Determination of quality of life (Quality of Life) using the IBS-QoL questionnaire during visits 1-5 (visit assessment: completed by the patient), Overall assessment of changes in gut health using a 7-point scale (Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale – PGI-I), assessed at visit 4 at the study center, Global assessment of efficacy by the investigator and the patient during visits 3 and 4 (4-point scale), Reduced use of loperamide, Buscopan®, and mebeverine as emergency medication for the treatment of IBS-D or IBS-M symptoms (visits 1 to 5), Compliance (amount of study medication consumed) during on-site visits 3 and 4 via drug accountability, Adverse events (AEs) throughout the study (V2-V5), Vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, body temperature) at V1-V5, Clinical chemistry and hematology at V1, V3, and V4, Assessment of tolerability by the investigator and the patient during visits 3 and 4

Interventions

Sponsors

REPHA GmbH Biologische Arzneimittel
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy is assessed by a responder criterion, which is specified differently for patients with IBS-D and IBS-M. For both subgroups, a response of the abdominal pain is required (NRS pain): IBS-D patients: additional assessment of stool consistency stool consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale). IBS-M patients: additionally an overall assessment of the change in bowel health using the PGI-I scale is also required.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Abdominal pain (NRS pain, measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale, pain intensity 0 – 10), daily entry in the patient diary, assessed during visits 1-5 at the study center, Number of spontaneous bowel movements, daily entries by the patient in the patient diary, Stool consistency on individual days measured using the Bristol Stool Form Scale, daily entry in the patient diary, assessed during visits 1-5 at the study center, Frequency of the feeling of incomplete bowel evacuation, daily entries by the patient in the patient diary, Occurrence of mucus and/or blood in the stool on individual days, daily entry in the patient diary, assessed during visits 1-5 at the study center, Assessment of the severity of IBS-D or IBS-M symptoms using the IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) during visits 1-5 (visit assessment: completed by the patient), Determination of quality of life (Quality of Life) using the IBS-QoL questionnaire during visits 1-5 (visit assessment: completed by the pati

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026