Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) type D
Conditions
Brief summary
Primary safety endpoints include the evaluation of AEs and SAEs (in case of SAE with deaths and relation to IMP)., Primary efficacy endpoints include change from Baseline in scores at each week of abdominal bloating, discomfort, pain, cramping and nausea as well as stool consistency response: the average BSFS score of all reported bowel movements on the specific day (daily average).
Detailed description
Change from Baseline in abdominal pain, diarrhea, stool consistency, abdominal discomfort, bloating and cramping, nausea, percent change in abdominal pain – all at their worst; 6/12 week responder from Baseline in abdominal pain (≥30% decrease and ≥2-point improvement), abdominal discomfort (≥2-point improvement), bloating (≥2-point improvement and increase of ≥1 CSBM/week); treatment satisfaction; adequate relief; change in diarrhea and QOL assessment at weeks 4, 8 and 12.
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Primary safety endpoints include the evaluation of AEs and SAEs (in case of SAE with deaths and relation to IMP)., Primary efficacy endpoints include change from Baseline in scores at each week of abdominal bloating, discomfort, pain, cramping and nausea as well as stool consistency response: the average BSFS score of all reported bowel movements on the specific day (daily average). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Change from Baseline in abdominal pain, diarrhea, stool consistency, abdominal discomfort, bloating and cramping, nausea, percent change in abdominal pain – all at their worst; 6/12 week responder from Baseline in abdominal pain (≥30% decrease and ≥2-point improvement), abdominal discomfort (≥2-point improvement), bloating (≥2-point improvement and increase of ≥1 CSBM/week); treatment satisfaction; adequate relief; change in diarrhea and QOL assessment at weeks 4, 8 and 12. | — |
Countries
Poland