Skip to content

EMMA - Medico Economic Evaluation of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Versus Dexametheasone Implant in Resistant Diabetic Macular Oedema

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2024-513983-24-00
Enrollment
106
Registered
2024-07-09
Start date
2021-10-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Oedema

Brief summary

Incremental cost-utility ratio at 3 years, from a societal point of view, expressed in terms of cost per year of life gained in good health (cost/QALY).

Detailed description

BCVA measured using the ETDRS at each follow-up visit (including inclusion): Construction of the average variation using the AUC approach over the 0-12 month, 0-24 month and 0-36 month periods, BCVA measured using the ETDRS at each follow-up visit (including inclusion): Construction of the difference between inclusion and 12, 24 and 36 months, BCVA measured using the ETDRS at each follow-up visit (including inclusion): Construction of the gain ≥15 letters (yes/no) variable at 12, 24 and 36 months compared with inclusion, BCVA measured using the ETDRS at each follow-up visit (including inclusion): Construction of the "BCVA involvement" ≥80 letters (yes/no) variable at 12, 24 and 36 months compared with inclusion, Central retinal thickness, measured as the central foveolar thickness by optical coherence tomography at inclusion, 12, 24, and 36 months: construction of the difference between inclusion and 12, 24 and 36 months, Treatment regimen (number of injections and time to re-injection), Additional ophthalmological treatments and visits compared with conventional follow-up., VFQ-25 quality of life scores at baseline and at 12, 24 and 36 months, Adverse events (ocular hypertonia with initiation of a new treatment or filtering surgery, endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, etc.) at 12, 24 and 36 months., Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at 3 years expressed in terms of cost per life-year gained, then in terms of cost per case of visual impairment avoided (visual impairment being defined by a result of 4/10ths, i.e. 65 letters ETDRS) and finally in terms of cost per case of legal blindness avoided (blindness being defined by a BCVA ≤ 1/20th, i.e. 20 letters ETDRS), Net financial impact of widespread use of the FA implant on the compulsory health insurance budget: costs incurred, costs avoided.

Interventions

DRUGILUVIEN 190 microgrammes
DRUGimplant intravitréen avec applicateur

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Dijon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incremental cost-utility ratio at 3 years, from a societal point of view, expressed in terms of cost per year of life gained in good health (cost/QALY).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
BCVA measured using the ETDRS at each follow-up visit (including inclusion): Construction of the average variation using the AUC approach over the 0-12 month, 0-24 month and 0-36 month periods, BCVA measured using the ETDRS at each follow-up visit (including inclusion): Construction of the difference between inclusion and 12, 24 and 36 months, BCVA measured using the ETDRS at each follow-up visit (including inclusion): Construction of the gain ≥15 letters (yes/no) variable at 12, 24 and 36 months compared with inclusion, BCVA measured using the ETDRS at each follow-up visit (including inclusion): Construction of the "BCVA involvement" ≥80 letters (yes/no) variable at 12, 24 and 36 months compared with inclusion, Central retinal thickness, measured as the central foveolar thickness by optical coherence tomography at inclusion, 12, 24, and 36 months: construction of the difference between inclusion and 12, 24 and 36 months, Treatment regimen (number of injections and time to re-injection

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026