Multiple Myeloma
Conditions
Brief summary
For both parts of the trial (A vs B and C vs D), the primary comparison of the 2 strategies will be made with respect to negative MRD rate (10-6 NGS) before maintenance using the chi square test in the ITT population. The observed MRD negative rate will be provided along with its 2-sided 95% Confidence interval (CI). Treatment effect will be described by an Odds Ratio, along with its 2-sided 95% confidence interval, by fitting a logistic regression model adjusted on stratification variables
Detailed description
Sustained MRD rate at year 2, 3, 4 post inclusion will be analyzed similarly to the primary endpoint., For Overall Survival (OS), the distribution of OS since randomization will be estimated using Kaplan Meier method. The comparison of the 2 arms will be made by log-rank test., Treatment effect will be described by Hazard Ratio and its 2-sided 95% confidence intervals are will be estimated using a Cox regression model adjusted on stratification variables (with high risk cytogenetics and MRD negative rate (10-5 NGS) after induction as fixed effects and center as random effects for A vs B comparison, and high risk cytogenetics as fixed effects and center as random effects for C vs D comparison)., Progression Free survival, defined as time from randomization to either progression or death will be analyzed similarly
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| For both parts of the trial (A vs B and C vs D), the primary comparison of the 2 strategies will be made with respect to negative MRD rate (10-6 NGS) before maintenance using the chi square test in the ITT population. The observed MRD negative rate will be provided along with its 2-sided 95% Confidence interval (CI). Treatment effect will be described by an Odds Ratio, along with its 2-sided 95% confidence interval, by fitting a logistic regression model adjusted on stratification variables | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Sustained MRD rate at year 2, 3, 4 post inclusion will be analyzed similarly to the primary endpoint., For Overall Survival (OS), the distribution of OS since randomization will be estimated using Kaplan Meier method. The comparison of the 2 arms will be made by log-rank test., Treatment effect will be described by Hazard Ratio and its 2-sided 95% confidence intervals are will be estimated using a Cox regression model adjusted on stratification variables (with high risk cytogenetics and MRD negative rate (10-5 NGS) after induction as fixed effects and center as random effects for A vs B comparison, and high risk cytogenetics as fixed effects and center as random effects for C vs D comparison)., Progression Free survival, defined as time from randomization to either progression or death will be analyzed similarly | — |
Countries
Belgium, France