Skip to content

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II proof of concept study evaluating efficacy and safety of Upadacitinib in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies after withdrawal of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) (IVIG-Spare)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2024-513681-19-00
Acronym
IVIG-SPARE Trial
Enrollment
10
Registered
2024-10-30
Start date
2025-01-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antisynthetase Syndrom, Dermatomyositis, Immune-mediating necrotising myopathie, overlap Myositis, Polymyositis

Brief summary

To assess the proportion of patients in IVIG-free stable disease activity at week 16 after randomization across two study arms comparing Upadacitinib 30 mg vs Placebo.

Detailed description

• Difference in proportion of patients in IVIG-free stable disease activity at week 20 between patients with Upadacitinib versus Placebo, Different proportion of patients with IVIG-free stable disease activity at week 16 and 20 using different definitions of disease worsening: (1) worsening PhGA by ≥ 2 cm NRS and worsening MMT-8 by ≥ 20%, or (2) worsening EmGA by ≥ 2 cm NRS or (3) a worsening of 3 of the 6 core set measures (HAQ-DI, MMT-8, CK, PhGA, PtGA, EmGA) by ≥ 30%., • Difference in time to first flare between patients with Upadacitinib versus Placebo, • Difference of manual muscle test between Upadacitinib and Placebo at week 16 and week 20, • Difference of patient reported outcomes, including 0- 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) of PtGA, EmGA, muscular pain, fatigue, dyspnoe and dysphagia; Quality of life, Health Assessment Questionaire Disability (HAQ-DI) between Upadacitinib and Placebo at week 16 and week 20, • Difference cumulative dose of steroids between patients with Upadacitinib versus Placebo at week 16 and 20, • Difference in laboratory parameters of values (CK, ALT, AST, LDH and aldolase) between Upadacitinib and Placebo at week 16 and week 20, • Differences in safety profile according to number of adverse events and organ systems (haematologic, hepatic, gastrointestinal, infections)

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo consists of gelatine capsules filled with maltodextrin

Sponsors

Medical University Of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the proportion of patients in IVIG-free stable disease activity at week 16 after randomization across two study arms comparing Upadacitinib 30 mg vs Placebo.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Difference in proportion of patients in IVIG-free stable disease activity at week 20 between patients with Upadacitinib versus Placebo, Different proportion of patients with IVIG-free stable disease activity at week 16 and 20 using different definitions of disease worsening: (1) worsening PhGA by ≥ 2 cm NRS and worsening MMT-8 by ≥ 20%, or (2) worsening EmGA by ≥ 2 cm NRS or (3) a worsening of 3 of the 6 core set measures (HAQ-DI, MMT-8, CK, PhGA, PtGA, EmGA) by ≥ 30%., • Difference in time to first flare between patients with Upadacitinib versus Placebo, • Difference of manual muscle test between Upadacitinib and Placebo at week 16 and week 20, • Difference of patient reported outcomes, including 0- 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) of PtGA, EmGA, muscular pain, fatigue, dyspnoe and dysphagia; Quality of life, Health Assessment Questionaire Disability (HAQ-DI) between Upadacitinib and Placebo at week 16 and week 20, • Difference cumulative dose of steroids between patients with Upadacit

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026