Adults and children with full thickness skin defects
Conditions
Brief summary
Efficacy evaluation, as a comparison between the EHSG-KF and control sites, based on assessment of general scar quality at the study areas using the POSAS questionnaire, observer total score at: visit 8 (90 days ± 5 days post grafting)
Detailed description
Efficacy evaluation, as a comparison between the EHSG-KF and control sites, based on (1): • Scar quality at the study areas in comparison to control areas: o Cutometer® pliability parameter at visit 8 (90 days ± 5 days post grafting) as key secondary efficacy endpoint o Other Cutometer® parameters (extension, elasticity, retraction, viscoelasticity) at visit 8 (90 days ± 5 days post grafting), Based on (2): • Scar quality at the study areas in comparison to control areas: o POSAS questionnaire observer items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability) at visit 8 (90 days ± 5 days post grafting) o POSAS questionnaire patient items (pain, itching, colour, pliability, thickness, relief) and total score at visit 8 (90 days ± 5 days after grafting), Based on (3): • Scar quality at the study areas in comparison to control areas: DSM ColorMeter® (erythema and pigmentation) at: visit 10 (1 year ± 30 days post grafting) o Optional biopsies of the study area and control area at visit 10 (1 year ± 30 days after grafting) for histological assessment. (optional) o Graft take at Visit 4 (6-10 days after grafting) o % Epithelialization at Visit 6 (28 days ± 3 days after grafting), Secondary safety endpoints: • Clinical and microbiologic signs of infection at o visit 4 (6-10 days post grafting) o visit 5 (21 ± 2 days post grafting) • Adverse events o Assessment and reporting of all observed adverse events will be carried out for the full duration of the study from visit 2 on., Other secondary efficacy endpoint: • QOL assessment: visit 10 (1 year ± 30 days post grafting) o EQ-5D and BSHS-B for patients ≥18 years with reconstruction of burn scars o EQ-5D only for patients ≥18 years without burn scars o EQ-5DY and PedsQL for patients <18 years
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Efficacy evaluation, as a comparison between the EHSG-KF and control sites, based on assessment of general scar quality at the study areas using the POSAS questionnaire, observer total score at: visit 8 (90 days ± 5 days post grafting) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Efficacy evaluation, as a comparison between the EHSG-KF and control sites, based on (1): • Scar quality at the study areas in comparison to control areas: o Cutometer® pliability parameter at visit 8 (90 days ± 5 days post grafting) as key secondary efficacy endpoint o Other Cutometer® parameters (extension, elasticity, retraction, viscoelasticity) at visit 8 (90 days ± 5 days post grafting), Based on (2): • Scar quality at the study areas in comparison to control areas: o POSAS questionnaire observer items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability) at visit 8 (90 days ± 5 days post grafting) o POSAS questionnaire patient items (pain, itching, colour, pliability, thickness, relief) and total score at visit 8 (90 days ± 5 days after grafting), Based on (3): • Scar quality at the study areas in comparison to control areas: DSM ColorMeter® (erythema and pigmentation) at: visit 10 (1 year ± 30 days post grafting) o Optional biopsies of the study area and control area at vi | — |
Countries
Italy, Netherlands