idiopathic bile acid diarrhoea (BAD)
Conditions
Brief summary
Proportion of study participants, who are stool consistency responders at Week 8 after T1 or T2 as compared to P. A stool consistency responder is defined as a participant who experiences a ≥50% reduction in the number of days with at least one stool that has a consistency of Type 6 or 7 in the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) compared with baseline.
Detailed description
01. Proportion of study participants, who are stool consistency responders at Week 2 and 4 after T1 or T2 as compared to P., 02. Proportion of study participants achieving remission of diarrhoea as per Hjortswang criteria, defined as <3 bowel movements per day and <1 stool per day with consistency of Type 6 or 7 in the 7-point BSFS calculated as the mean of the last 7 days prior to Week 8 after T1 or T2 as compared to P., 03. Proportion of study participants, who are stool frequency responders at Week 8 after T1 or T2 as compared to P. A stool frequency responder is defined as a participant, who experiences a ≥50% reduction in the number of days with ≥3 bowel movements compared with baseline, 04. Proportion of study participants who achieve remission in urgency, defined as a score of <3 in the urgency numerical rating scale at Week 2, 4 and 8 after treatment with T1 or T2 as compared to P., 05. To compare between treatments the proportion of patients with and the number of adverse drug reactions after 8 weeks of treatment.
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Proportion of study participants, who are stool consistency responders at Week 8 after T1 or T2 as compared to P. A stool consistency responder is defined as a participant who experiences a ≥50% reduction in the number of days with at least one stool that has a consistency of Type 6 or 7 in the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) compared with baseline. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 01. Proportion of study participants, who are stool consistency responders at Week 2 and 4 after T1 or T2 as compared to P., 02. Proportion of study participants achieving remission of diarrhoea as per Hjortswang criteria, defined as <3 bowel movements per day and <1 stool per day with consistency of Type 6 or 7 in the 7-point BSFS calculated as the mean of the last 7 days prior to Week 8 after T1 or T2 as compared to P., 03. Proportion of study participants, who are stool frequency responders at Week 8 after T1 or T2 as compared to P. A stool frequency responder is defined as a participant, who experiences a ≥50% reduction in the number of days with ≥3 bowel movements compared with baseline, 04. Proportion of study participants who achieve remission in urgency, defined as a score of <3 in the urgency numerical rating scale at Week 2, 4 and 8 after treatment with T1 or T2 as compared to P., 05. To compare between treatments the proportion of patients with and the number of adverse drug | — |
Countries
Belgium, Denmark, Italy, Romania, Spain