Skip to content

The bilateral sentinel node detection rate of fluorescent indocyanine green compared to 99mTc and blue dye in the sentinel node procedure in stage I-IIA cervical cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2024-511966-36-00
Enrollment
101
Registered
2024-05-10
Start date
2021-04-26
Completion date
2025-08-07
Last updated
2024-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cervical cancer stage I-IIA

Brief summary

Bilateral detection rate of SLNs with ICG and NIR fluorescence imaging versus 99mTc with blue dye. A SLN is defined as the first lymph node(s) of each hemipelvis to receive afferent lymphatic drainage from the primary cervical tumour, identified by either ICG, gamma radiation using 99mTc or blue dye. Bilateral detection rate of a tracer/modality is defined as number of patients detected with at least one SLN in each hemipelvis divided by the total number of patients undergoing SLN procedure.

Detailed description

Overall detection rate (defined as the proportion of patients in which at least one SLN is detected) - Sensitivity and FNR (defined as the proportion of patients with tumour-negative SLNs and tumour-positive non-SLNs divided by the total number of patients with lymph node metastasis) of ICG and 99mTc and blue dye, with PLND as gold standard to confirm tumour positive non-SLNs (part of current standard-of-care)., The number of SLNs identified with NIR fluorescence, radioactivity and blue staining. - Concordance between ICG and 99mTc with blue dye in terms of SLN localisation, by strictly reporting all localisations and whether positive with ICG, SPECT-CT (preoperatively), 99mTc,or blue dye, or a combination of these. - Adverse events of ICG, 99mTc and/or blue dye; - The time to complete SLN detection with ICG versus 99mTc + blue dye, Cost-effectiveness, defined as the costs of the procedure versus the yielded bilateral detection rate of the procedure; - Patient satisfaction with the oncological care and procedure measured with the validated EORTC IN-PATSAT32 questionnaire; - Surgical evaluation of fluorescent imaging (usability) measured with two short questionnaires tailored for the surgeons.

Interventions

DRUGINDOCYANINE GREEN

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bilateral detection rate of SLNs with ICG and NIR fluorescence imaging versus 99mTc with blue dye. A SLN is defined as the first lymph node(s) of each hemipelvis to receive afferent lymphatic drainage from the primary cervical tumour, identified by either ICG, gamma radiation using 99mTc or blue dye. Bilateral detection rate of a tracer/modality is defined as number of patients detected with at least one SLN in each hemipelvis divided by the total number of patients undergoing SLN procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Overall detection rate (defined as the proportion of patients in which at least one SLN is detected) - Sensitivity and FNR (defined as the proportion of patients with tumour-negative SLNs and tumour-positive non-SLNs divided by the total number of patients with lymph node metastasis) of ICG and 99mTc and blue dye, with PLND as gold standard to confirm tumour positive non-SLNs (part of current standard-of-care)., The number of SLNs identified with NIR fluorescence, radioactivity and blue staining. - Concordance between ICG and 99mTc with blue dye in terms of SLN localisation, by strictly reporting all localisations and whether positive with ICG, SPECT-CT (preoperatively), 99mTc,or blue dye, or a combination of these. - Adverse events of ICG, 99mTc and/or blue dye; - The time to complete SLN detection with ICG versus 99mTc + blue dye, Cost-effectiveness, defined as the costs of the procedure versus the yielded bilateral detection rate of the procedure; - Patient satisfaction with the onc

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026