Skip to content

A long-term safety and efficacy study of N-Acetyl-GED-0507-34-LEVO gel 5%, in subjects with acne vulgaris (GEDACNE-LT)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2023-510342-24-00
Acronym
NACGED0507ACN0123LT
Enrollment
320
Registered
2024-10-03
Start date
2024-11-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne vulgaris

Brief summary

Safety endpoint: Incidence of all Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAES), Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) throughout the study; with special attention to local TEAEs concerning the treated facial area (local dermal safety), and systemic TEAEs, Safety endpoint: Frequency of discontinuation of treatment due to TEAEs, Safety endpoint: Changes from baseline of vital signs during the study, Safety endpoint: Physical examination during the study, Safety endpoint: Changes from baseline of laboratory test over the study duration., Safety endpoint: Change from baseline of local tolerability- Application site signs/symptoms during the study* *Local tolerability will be evaluated based on the following signs and symptoms: application site non-lesional erythema, application site exfoliation, and application site dryness, stinging, burning, itching. For each sign/symptom, a severity score will be assigned using a 4-point scale from 0 = absent to 3 = severe., Safety endpoint: Assessment of overall application site irritation over the study duration.

Detailed description

Efficacy endpoint - FACE: Percentage of patients who have improvement of IGA score at each time point (1,2 points), vs baseline score, Efficacy endpoint - FACE: The percentage change from baseline in total lesion count (inflammatory plus non-inflammatory) at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - FACE: Absolute change from baseline in total lesion count at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - FACE: Change from baseline in inflammatory lesion count (percentage and absolute), at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - FACE: Change from baseline in non-inflammatory lesion count (percentage and absolute), at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - TRUNK: Percentage of patients who have improvement of PGA score at each time point (1,2 points), vs baseline score, Efficacy endpoint - TRUNK: The percentage change from baseline in total lesion count (inflammatory plus non-inflammatory) at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - TRUNK: Absolute change from baseline in total lesion count at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - TRUNK: Change from baseline in inflammatory lesion count (percentage and absolute), at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - TRUNK: Change from baseline in non-inflammatory lesion count (percentage and absolute), at each time point., Efficacy endpoint - OTHER: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) / Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (C-DLQI for patients from 9 to 16 years old), completed by the patient at Baseline, Wk12, and Wk52 visits (prior to any Investigator assessments to not impact the patient’s answers to the quality-of-life questionnaires), Efficacy endpoint - OTHER: Additional Assessment by Scale for Acne Severity of additional evaluation at Baseline, Wk12, Wk26, Wk38 and Wk52 visits., Efficacy endpoint - OTHER: At Baseline, Wk12 and Wk52 additional documentation will be optional. The area defined for additional assessments is only the face.

Interventions

Sponsors

PPM Services S.A.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 Years to 64 Years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Safety endpoint: Incidence of all Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAES), Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) throughout the study; with special attention to local TEAEs concerning the treated facial area (local dermal safety), and systemic TEAEs, Safety endpoint: Frequency of discontinuation of treatment due to TEAEs, Safety endpoint: Changes from baseline of vital signs during the study, Safety endpoint: Physical examination during the study, Safety endpoint: Changes from baseline of laboratory test over the study duration., Safety endpoint: Change from baseline of local tolerability- Application site signs/symptoms during the study* *Local tolerability will be evaluated based on the following signs and symptoms: application site non-lesional erythema, application site exfoliation, and application site dryness, stinging, burning, itching. For each sign/symptom, a severity score will be assigned using a 4-point scale from 0 = absent to

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy endpoint - FACE: Percentage of patients who have improvement of IGA score at each time point (1,2 points), vs baseline score, Efficacy endpoint - FACE: The percentage change from baseline in total lesion count (inflammatory plus non-inflammatory) at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - FACE: Absolute change from baseline in total lesion count at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - FACE: Change from baseline in inflammatory lesion count (percentage and absolute), at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - FACE: Change from baseline in non-inflammatory lesion count (percentage and absolute), at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - TRUNK: Percentage of patients who have improvement of PGA score at each time point (1,2 points), vs baseline score, Efficacy endpoint - TRUNK: The percentage change from baseline in total lesion count (inflammatory plus non-inflammatory) at each time point, Efficacy endpoint - TRUNK: Absolute change from baseline in total lesion count at each time point,

Countries

Italy, Poland, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026