Skip to content

RElapse from Mrd Negativity As iNdication for Treatment

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2023-510215-18-00
Acronym
OMC01/19
Enrollment
391
Registered
2024-09-26
Start date
2024-09-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple myeloma

Brief summary

Part 1: 1. The number of patients who achieve MRD negativity measured by Euroflow at 30-45 days after the 4th cycle of consolidation therapy has started., Part 2: 1. PFS rate of Arm A (MRD guided) vs Arm B defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death due to any cause following 2.L treatment. 2. OS rate of Arm A (MRD guided) vs Arm B defined as the time from randomization to death of any cause following 2.L treatment.

Detailed description

Part 1: 1. The PFS rate of patients receiving 4 cycles of VRd as consolidation 2. The OS rate of patients receiving 4 cycles of VRd as consolidation 3. The number of AEs and relevant laboratory parameters monitored at every visit from entry into part 1 of the study until end of part 1 4. The proportion of patients who achieve PR or better following 4 cycles of VRd consolidation treatment, Part 2: 1.Time from randomization to start of 3.L therapy (TTNT) 2.The proportion of patients who achieve MRD negativity during 2.L treatment, monitored by MRD Euroflow at 6 and 18 months in arm A, and after achieving CR in arm B (first MRD testing after 6 months). 3.Patient reported outcome HRQOL forms will be filled out by patients at defined time points during the study and finally at relapse after 2.L therapy. 4.The number of AEs

Interventions

DRUGDexametason Abcur 1 mg tabletter
DRUGCARFILZOMIB
DRUGDARATUMUMAB

Sponsors

Oslo University Hospital HF
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Part 1: 1. The number of patients who achieve MRD negativity measured by Euroflow at 30-45 days after the 4th cycle of consolidation therapy has started., Part 2: 1. PFS rate of Arm A (MRD guided) vs Arm B defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death due to any cause following 2.L treatment. 2. OS rate of Arm A (MRD guided) vs Arm B defined as the time from randomization to death of any cause following 2.L treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Part 1: 1. The PFS rate of patients receiving 4 cycles of VRd as consolidation 2. The OS rate of patients receiving 4 cycles of VRd as consolidation 3. The number of AEs and relevant laboratory parameters monitored at every visit from entry into part 1 of the study until end of part 1 4. The proportion of patients who achieve PR or better following 4 cycles of VRd consolidation treatment, Part 2: 1.Time from randomization to start of 3.L therapy (TTNT) 2.The proportion of patients who achieve MRD negativity during 2.L treatment, monitored by MRD Euroflow at 6 and 18 months in arm A, and after achieving CR in arm B (first MRD testing after 6 months). 3.Patient reported outcome HRQOL forms will be filled out by patients at defined time points during the study and finally at relapse after 2.L therapy. 4.The number of AEs

Countries

Lithuania, Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026