Skip to content

A Phase 2b Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Administration of Bacteriophage Therapy TP-102 in Patients with Diabetic Foot Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2023-507716-13-00
Acronym
TP-102_102
Enrollment
26
Registered
2024-01-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
2025-12-19
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic foot ulcers infected by Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and /or Staphylococcus aureus

Brief summary

Number and percentage of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT];, Statistically significant change in the percentage of patients in the respective IWGDF/IDSA classes for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT];, Percentage of patients that achieve at least 50% reduction in wound surface area by week 4 for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT].

Detailed description

Change in mean CRP/ESR/PCT/WBC count value for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT];, Percentage of patients with a value over clinical diagnostic cut-off for DFI for CRP/ESR/PCT/WBC count for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT];, Percentage eradication of TP-102 susceptible strains for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC, at EOT;, Percentage of patients with target strain not-susceptible to TP-102 for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC, at EOT;, Changes in wound size, depth, granulation and partial closure (25%, 50%, 75%)from baseline, for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 3, 8, 15, EOT and EOS]., Percentage of patients that achieve wound healing (complete wound closure) by EOS for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to FUP2]., Total Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the mean DFUWI score for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT].

Interventions

DRUGCloreto de Sódio 0
DRUG9 % Labesfal
DRUGSolução injetável
DRUGTP-102

Sponsors

Technophage Investigacao E Desenvolvimento Em Biotecnologia S.A.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number and percentage of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT];, Statistically significant change in the percentage of patients in the respective IWGDF/IDSA classes for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT];, Percentage of patients that achieve at least 50% reduction in wound surface area by week 4 for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT].

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in mean CRP/ESR/PCT/WBC count value for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT];, Percentage of patients with a value over clinical diagnostic cut-off for DFI for CRP/ESR/PCT/WBC count for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT];, Percentage eradication of TP-102 susceptible strains for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC, at EOT;, Percentage of patients with target strain not-susceptible to TP-102 for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC, at EOT;, Changes in wound size, depth, granulation and partial closure (25%, 50%, 75%)from baseline, for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 3, 8, 15, EOT and EOS]., Percentage of patients that achieve wound healing (complete wound closure) by EOS for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to FUP2]., Total Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the mean DFUWI score for TP-102 versus Placebo, in addition to SoC [Day 1 (Baseline) to EOT].

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026