Skip to content

A Phase 2, Open-Label, Ascending Dose Study of KER-050 for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients with Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2023-507469-24-00
Acronym
KER050-MD-201
Enrollment
56
Registered
2024-09-16
Start date
2022-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia in Patients with Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Brief summary

Part 1 and Part 2: • Safety and tolerability as determined by the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events(TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)., Long-term Extension: •Safety and tolerability as determined by the incidence of TEAEs and SAEs over time

Detailed description

Incidence of progression to higher risk MDS or AML per World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 criteria., Proportion of low transfusion burden (LTB) and high transfusion burden (HTB) participants who achieve red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 8 weeks, overall and by RS status., Proportion of participants who achieve modified 2006 International Working Group (IWG) Hematologic Improvement-Erythroid (HI E) response overall and by RS status (See Table 3 in Protocol KER050-MD-201 v 7.0)., Efficacy Endpoint: Proportion of participants who achieve overall erythroid response, defined as either HI-E or TI over any 8-week period, overall and by RS status, Efficacy Endpoint: Proportion of participants who achieve erythropoietic improvement overall and by RS status (See Table 3 in Protocol KER050-MD-201 v 7.0)., Efficacy Endpoint: Mean change from Baseline in Hgb by visit, Efficacy Endpoint: Time to HI-E response., Efficacy Endpoint: Duration of HI-E response., Efficacy Endpoint: Time to TI response., Efficacy Endpoint: Time to TI response., Efficacy Endpoint: Proportion of LTB and HTB participants who achieve TI ≥ 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks., Proportion of LTB and HTB participants who achieve TI ≥ 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks., Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Change from baseline of red cell parameters, including reticulocyte count, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, and reticulocyte cell Hgb by visit.

Interventions

Sponsors

Takeda Development Center Americas Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Part 1 and Part 2: • Safety and tolerability as determined by the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events(TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)., Long-term Extension: •Safety and tolerability as determined by the incidence of TEAEs and SAEs over time

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of progression to higher risk MDS or AML per World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 criteria., Proportion of low transfusion burden (LTB) and high transfusion burden (HTB) participants who achieve red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 8 weeks, overall and by RS status., Proportion of participants who achieve modified 2006 International Working Group (IWG) Hematologic Improvement-Erythroid (HI E) response overall and by RS status (See Table 3 in Protocol KER050-MD-201 v 7.0)., Efficacy Endpoint: Proportion of participants who achieve overall erythroid response, defined as either HI-E or TI over any 8-week period, overall and by RS status, Efficacy Endpoint: Proportion of participants who achieve erythropoietic improvement overall and by RS status (See Table 3 in Protocol KER050-MD-201 v 7.0)., Efficacy Endpoint: Mean change from Baseline in Hgb by visit, Efficacy Endpoint: Time to HI-E response., Efficacy Endpoint: Duration of HI-E response., Efficacy Endpoint: Ti

Countries

Czechia, France, Germany, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026