Skip to content

(Neo)adjuvant IDE196 (Darovasertib) in Patients with Localized Ocular Melanoma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2023-506683-14-00
Acronym
IDE196-009
Enrollment
36
Registered
2023-12-20
Start date
2024-06-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uveal Melanoma

Brief summary

The incidence of adverse events (AEs) leading to dose interruption, modification, and discontinuation during neoadjuvant therapy • The incidence of Grade 3 or 4 AEs and clinically significant laboratory abnormalities during neoadjuvant therapy, Cohort 1 – Percentage of patients converted from planned enucleation to eye preserving therapy (e.g., plaque brachytherapy, proton beam radiotherapy, or other) • Cohort 2 –Percentage of patients with a reduction in radiatiAon dose to the fovea, optic disc center, or optic nerve determined by independent central dosimetry modeling, Proportion of subjects with CBR defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD) ≥ 12 weeks per the UM response criteria

Detailed description

Time from first dose to time of primary local therapy, Tumor response (CR + PR), Decrease in tumor apical height or bidirectional measurements that include the apical height (tumor thickness) and LBD, Loss of ≥ 15 letters by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score, Local disease recurrence rate

Interventions

DRUGNORETHISTERONE AND ETHINYLESTRADIOL
DRUGMETFORMIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsors

Ideaya Biosciences Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The incidence of adverse events (AEs) leading to dose interruption, modification, and discontinuation during neoadjuvant therapy • The incidence of Grade 3 or 4 AEs and clinically significant laboratory abnormalities during neoadjuvant therapy, Cohort 1 – Percentage of patients converted from planned enucleation to eye preserving therapy (e.g., plaque brachytherapy, proton beam radiotherapy, or other) • Cohort 2 –Percentage of patients with a reduction in radiatiAon dose to the fovea, optic disc center, or optic nerve determined by independent central dosimetry modeling, Proportion of subjects with CBR defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD) ≥ 12 weeks per the UM response criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time from first dose to time of primary local therapy, Tumor response (CR + PR), Decrease in tumor apical height or bidirectional measurements that include the apical height (tumor thickness) and LBD, Loss of ≥ 15 letters by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score, Local disease recurrence rate

Countries

France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026