Skip to content

A randomised, controlled trial to investigate the effect of a six-week intensified pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia compared to treatment as usual in subjects who had a first-time treatment failure on their first-line treatment.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2023-506602-39-00
Acronym
INTENSIFY SZ
Enrollment
310
Registered
2023-12-20
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenifom disorder

Brief summary

Mean change from baseline (visit 2) in symptom severity as measured by the PANSS total score at six weeks (visit 4) will be compared between the two treatment arms (EIPT vs. TAU. )

Detailed description

Change from baseline (visit 2) in PANSS subscale scores (positive, negative and general) at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU., 2.a. Change from baseline (visit 2) in the severity sub-score of the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI 1) at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU. 2.b. Improvement sub-score of the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI 1) at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU., Changes from baseline (visit 2) in total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) total score and anxiety and depression subscales at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU., Change from baseline (visit 2) in quality of life and functioning measures (Q-LES-Q-SF, LAPS, QLS-100 and SDS) at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU., Changes from baseline (visit 2) on Trail Making Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test as well as the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU., Presence of symptomatic remission at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU. Remission is defined as meeting the PANSS modified Andreasen criteria (Low scores (≤3) P1. Delusions; P3. Hallucinatory behavior; P2. Conceptual disorganization; N1. Blunted affect; N4. Passive/apathetic social withdrawal; N6. Lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation; G5. Mannerisms/posturing; G9. Unusual thought content., Presence of reported adverse events (related and unrelated to treatment) as measured through General Assessment of Side Effects Scale (GASE) and reported spontaneously througout the study; EIPT vs TAU., Concomitant medication use throughout the study; EIPT vs TAU., Premature treatment discontinuation before visit 4 and time to treatment discontinuation and reported reason of discontinuation; EIPT vs TAU., Changes on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) throughout the study; EIPT vs TAU.

Interventions

DRUGQUETIAPINE
DRUGCARIPRAZINE
DRUGASENAPINE
DRUGARIPIPRAZOLE
DRUGAMISULPRIDE
DRUGHALOPERIDOL
DRUGBREXPIPRAZOLE
DRUGPALIPERIDONE
DRUGLURASIDONE
DRUGZIPRASIDONE
DRUGPROMAZINE
DRUGCLOZAPINE
DRUGCLOTIAPINE
DRUGRISPERIDONE
DRUGOLANZAPINE

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean change from baseline (visit 2) in symptom severity as measured by the PANSS total score at six weeks (visit 4) will be compared between the two treatment arms (EIPT vs. TAU. )

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline (visit 2) in PANSS subscale scores (positive, negative and general) at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU., 2.a. Change from baseline (visit 2) in the severity sub-score of the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI 1) at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU. 2.b. Improvement sub-score of the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI 1) at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU., Changes from baseline (visit 2) in total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) total score and anxiety and depression subscales at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU., Change from baseline (visit 2) in quality of life and functioning measures (Q-LES-Q-SF, LAPS, QLS-100 and SDS) at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU., Changes from baseline (visit 2) on Trail Making Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test as well as the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU., Presence of symptomatic remission at visit 4; EIPT vs TAU. Remission is defined as meeting the PANSS modified Andreasen criteria (Low scores (≤3) P1. Delusio

Countries

Austria, Germany, Italy, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026