Papulopustular acne
Conditions
Brief summary
Primary efficacy endpoints to be analysed are the percent change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline (Day 0) to week 12 (Day 84) as well as the percent change in total lesion count from baseline (Day 0) to week 12 (Day 84)
Detailed description
Percent change from baseline (Visit 1) to Visit 8 (EoT) assessed by the non-inflammatory lesion count as well as the total lesion count, Percent change in inflammatory lesion count, non-inflammatory lesion count and total lesion count between baseline (Visit 1) and Visit 2, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7, respectively, Absolute changes in inflammatory lesion count, non-inflammatory lesion count and total lesion count between baseline (Visit 1) and Visit 2, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, Visit 7 and Visit 8, respectively, Proportion of subjects with a clinical response of “success”, i.e. an IGA score of at least 2 grades less than the baseline assessment, at Visit 8., Change of the Investigator`s Global Assessment (IGA) between baseline (Visit 1) and Visit 2, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, Visit 7 and Visit 8, respectively. Changes will be calculated as baseline- follow-up., Evaluation of the overall therapeutic success by the investigator and patient at Visit 8, Incidence of adverse events (AEs) during the course of the study, Evaluation of tolerability by the investigator and by the patient from Visit 2 to Visit 8 (EoT)
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Primary efficacy endpoints to be analysed are the percent change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline (Day 0) to week 12 (Day 84) as well as the percent change in total lesion count from baseline (Day 0) to week 12 (Day 84) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Percent change from baseline (Visit 1) to Visit 8 (EoT) assessed by the non-inflammatory lesion count as well as the total lesion count, Percent change in inflammatory lesion count, non-inflammatory lesion count and total lesion count between baseline (Visit 1) and Visit 2, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7, respectively, Absolute changes in inflammatory lesion count, non-inflammatory lesion count and total lesion count between baseline (Visit 1) and Visit 2, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, Visit 7 and Visit 8, respectively, Proportion of subjects with a clinical response of “success”, i.e. an IGA score of at least 2 grades less than the baseline assessment, at Visit 8., Change of the Investigator`s Global Assessment (IGA) between baseline (Visit 1) and Visit 2, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, Visit 7 and Visit 8, respectively. Changes will be calculated as baseline- follow-up., Evaluation of the overall therapeutic success by the investigator and patient at Visit | — |
Countries
Germany