Unequivocal epicardial and/or microvascular vasospastic angina
Conditions
Brief summary
Difference in area under the curve for cutaneous microvascular conductance in APU/s during acetylcholine iontophoresis after 10-week placebo- versus 10-week vericiguat treatment periods, Difference in daily episodes of angina recorded on the ORBITA-app after placebo- versus 10-week vericiguat treatment periods.
Detailed description
Difference in peak cutaneous microvascular conductance in APU/mmHg during acetylcholine iontophoresis after 10-week placebo- versus 10-week vericiguat treatment periods, Difference in the absolute and relative change in cutaneous microvascular conductance from baseline conditions to peak conductance during acetylcholine iontophoresis in APU/mmHg) after 10-week placebo- versus 10-week vericiguat treatment, Difference in vasodilator function assessed with EndoPAT after 10-week placebo versus 10-week vericiguat treatment expressed by the Reactive hyperemia index (RHI), calculated as the index of signal amplitude pre-to-post occlusion in the occluded arm, divided by the same ratio in the control arm, Microvascular function assessed with LASCA on placebo versus vericiguat treatment using SNP and insulin: Difference in cutaneous microvascular conductance in APU/mmHg during SNP or insulin iontophoresis after 10-week placebo- versus 10-week vericiguat treatment periods, Microvascular function assessed with LASCA on placebo versus vericiguat treatment using SNP and insulin: Difference in the area under the curve for cutaneous microvascular conductance in APU/s during SNP or insulin iontophoresis after 10-week placebo- versus 10-week vericiguat treatment periods, Difference in peak cutaneous microvascular conductance, area under the curve for cutaneous microvascular conductance, absolute and relative changes in cutaneous microvascular conductance, and reactive hyperemia index after 10-week placebo versus 10-week vericiguat treatment stratified by the vericiguat dose reached during the treatment phase (5 or 10mg), Peak cutaneous microvascular conductance, area under the curve for cutaneous microvascular conductance, absolute and relative changes in cutaneous microvascular conductance, and reactive hyperemia index after 10-week placebo versus 10-week vericiguat treatment stratified by epicardial or microvascular vasospasm endotype., Difference in quality of life measured by the ORBITA-2 application, Seattle Angina Questionnaire Summary Score, Rose Dyspnea Score, EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS scores, iPCQ and iMCQ index scores after 10-week placebo versus 10-week vericiguat treatment periods, Difference in the change in quality of life measured by the ORBITA-2 application, Seattle Angina Questionnaire Summary Score, Rose Dyspnea Score, EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS scores, iPCQ and iMCQ index scores from baseline (prior to randomization) to 10-week placebo and 10-week vericiguat treatment periods, Angina burden calculated by the frequency of angina attacks for placebo versus vericiguat treatment periods, using the ORBITA-2 application., The occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (hospitalization for angina, spontaneous myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, death) during the study period.
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Difference in area under the curve for cutaneous microvascular conductance in APU/s during acetylcholine iontophoresis after 10-week placebo- versus 10-week vericiguat treatment periods, Difference in daily episodes of angina recorded on the ORBITA-app after placebo- versus 10-week vericiguat treatment periods. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Difference in peak cutaneous microvascular conductance in APU/mmHg during acetylcholine iontophoresis after 10-week placebo- versus 10-week vericiguat treatment periods, Difference in the absolute and relative change in cutaneous microvascular conductance from baseline conditions to peak conductance during acetylcholine iontophoresis in APU/mmHg) after 10-week placebo- versus 10-week vericiguat treatment, Difference in vasodilator function assessed with EndoPAT after 10-week placebo versus 10-week vericiguat treatment expressed by the Reactive hyperemia index (RHI), calculated as the index of signal amplitude pre-to-post occlusion in the occluded arm, divided by the same ratio in the control arm, Microvascular function assessed with LASCA on placebo versus vericiguat treatment using SNP and insulin: Difference in cutaneous microvascular conductance in APU/mmHg during SNP or insulin iontophoresis after 10-week placebo- versus 10-week vericiguat treatment periods, Microvascular function | — |
Countries
Netherlands