Skip to content

An Open-label Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Pharmacodynamics, and Immunogenicity of Cipaglucosidase Alfa/Miglustat in Pediatric Subjects Aged 0 to < 18 Years with Late-onset Pompe Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2022-502547-36-00
Acronym
ATB200-04
Enrollment
9
Registered
2023-10-24
Start date
2024-03-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Late-onset Pompe disease

Brief summary

1. Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs, SAEs, IARs, and AEs leading to discontinuation of study drug, 2. Change in anti-rhGAA antibody titers (total and neutralizing) from baseline over time, 3. Change in clinical laboratory test results from baseline over time, 4. Change in vital signs from baseline over time, 5. Change in 12-lead ECG values from baseline over time

Detailed description

1. AUC: area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve, 2. Cmax: maximum observed concentration obtained directly from the concentration profile, 3. (Cohort 1) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following variables related to ambulatory function: − 6MWD (distance walked, in meters, in the 6MWT) − 6MWD (% predicted), 4. (Cohort 1) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following variables related to motor function: − total score of the Gait, Stairs, Gowers’ maneuver, and Chair (GSGC) test − time to complete the 10-meter walk (ie, assessment of gait) of the GSGC test − time to complete the 4-stair climb of the GSGC test − time to complete the Gowers’ maneuver of the GSGC test − time to arise from a chair as part of the GSGC test − time to complete the TUG test − total and subdomain scores for the GMFM-88, 5. (Cohort 1) Time to initiation of use of assistive device, 6. (Cohort 1) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following variables related to muscle strength: − MMT score for the lower and upper extremities − MMT total score, 7. (Cohort 1) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following measures of pulmonary function: − FVC sitting (% predicted) − SVC sitting (% predicted) − maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (cmH2O) − MIP (% predicted) − maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) (cmH2O) − MEP (% predicted) − ventilator use (hours per day), 8. (Cohort 1) Ventilator independence (for non ventilator-dependent subjects only), 9. (Cohort 1) CPAP/BiPAP use, 10. (Cohort 1) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following variables from PRO measures: − score for NeuroQOL Pediatric Lower Extremity Function (Mobility), 11. (Cohort 1) Actual value of the subject’s functional status (improving, stable, or declining) pertaining to the effects of study drug in the following areas of life, as measured by the SGIC as reported by the subject or subject’s caregiver: − overall physical well-being − effort of breathing − muscle strength − muscle function − ability to move around − activities of daily living − energy level − level of muscular pain, 12. (Cohort 1) Actual value of the subject’s functional status (improving, stable, or declining), as measured by the PGIC, 13. (Cohort 2) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following variables related to ambulatory function (for subjects ≥ 5 years of age) − 6MWD (distance walked, in meters, in the 6MWT) − 6MWD (% predicted), 14. (Cohort 2) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following variables related to motor function: − total score for the AIMS (for subjects ≤ 18 months of age) − total and subdomain scores for the GMFM-88 (for subjects ≥ 5 months of age), 15. (Cohort 2) Time to initiation of use of assistive device, 16. (Cohort 2) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following variables related to muscle strength (for subjects ≥ 4 years of age) − MMT score for the lower and upper extremities and neck − MMT total score, 17. (Cohort 2) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following measures of pulmonary function (for subjects ≥ 5 years of age): − FVC sitting (% predicted) − SVC sitting (% predicted) − MIP (cmH2O) − MIP (% predicted) − MEP (cmH2O) − MEP (% predicted) − ventilator use (hours per day), 18. (Cohort 2) Ventilator independence (for non-ventilator dependent subjects only), 19. (Cohort 2) CPAP/BiPAP use, 20. (Cohort 2) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following variables from patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: − score for NeuroQOL Pediatric Lower Extremity Function (Mobility), 21. (Cohort 2) Actual value of the subject’s functional status (improving, stable, or declining) pertaining to the effects of study drug in the following areas of life, as measured by the SGIC as reported by the subject or subject’s caregiver: − overall physical well-being − effort of breathing − muscle strength − muscle function − ability to move around − activities of daily living − energy level − level of muscular pain, 22. (Cohort 2) Actual value of the subject’s functional status (improving, stable, or declining), as measured by the PGIC, 23. Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following PD variables: − serum CK level − urinary Hex4 level, 24. Immunogenicity endpoints are as follows for both cohorts: Total and neutralizing anti-rhGAA antibodies

Interventions

Sponsors

Amicus Therapeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 Years to 17 Years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs, SAEs, IARs, and AEs leading to discontinuation of study drug, 2. Change in anti-rhGAA antibody titers (total and neutralizing) from baseline over time, 3. Change in clinical laboratory test results from baseline over time, 4. Change in vital signs from baseline over time, 5. Change in 12-lead ECG values from baseline over time

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. AUC: area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve, 2. Cmax: maximum observed concentration obtained directly from the concentration profile, 3. (Cohort 1) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following variables related to ambulatory function: − 6MWD (distance walked, in meters, in the 6MWT) − 6MWD (% predicted), 4. (Cohort 1) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following variables related to motor function: − total score of the Gait, Stairs, Gowers’ maneuver, and Chair (GSGC) test − time to complete the 10-meter walk (ie, assessment of gait) of the GSGC test − time to complete the 4-stair climb of the GSGC test − time to complete the Gowers’ maneuver of the GSGC test − time to arise from a chair as part of the GSGC test − time to complete the TUG test − total and subdomain scores for the GMFM-88, 5. (Cohort 1) Time to initiation of use of assistive device, 6. (Cohort 1) Change from baseline to Week 52 in the following variables related to muscle strength: − MMT score f

Countries

Germany, Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026