Skip to content

Efficacy and Tolerability of AP707 in Patients with chronic Pain due to Diabetic Polyneuropathy

Status
Suspended
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2022-500897-32-00
Acronym
DISCOVER_(PNP1)
Enrollment
558
Registered
2023-06-12
Start date
2023-11-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic pain due to diabetic polyneuropathy

Brief summary

1) Change in pain level on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) between baseline and at treatment week 14 (end of first treatment phase) in comparison of study arm 1 (verum) and study arm 2 (placebo)

Detailed description

2) Change in pain level on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) between baseline and at treatment week 26 (end of second treatment phase) in comparison of study arm 1 (verum) and study arm 2 (placebo), 3) Change in pain level on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) between baseline and at treatment week 52 (end of third treatment phase) in comparison of study arm 1 (verum) and study arm 2 (placebo), 4) Change in the pain score of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) questionnaire between baseline established in the last week before start of randomized treatment and at treatment week 14 (end of first treatment phase), at treatment week 26 (end of second treatment phase), and at treatment week 52 (end of third treatment phase) in comparison of study arm 1 (verum) and study arm 2 (placebo), 5) Change in pain level on the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) between baseline and in treatment week 5, 11, 18, 22, 30, 34, 43, 47 in comparison of study arm 1 (verum) and study arm 2 (placebo), 6) Responder analysis for endpoints 1), 2), 3) and 4) for treatment week 14, 26 and 52: 1. Proportion of patients who experienced > 30 % improvement in pain score (Numeric Rating Scale); 2. Proportion of patients who experienced > 40 % improvement in pain score (Numeric Rating Scale); 3. Proportion of patients who experienced > 50 % improvement in pain score (Numeric Rating Scale), 7) Change in sCPT (percentage of change in dosage and percentage of change in combination of analgesic measures) in both study arms from start to week 14, 8) Change in psychological distress using Depression Anxiety Stress Scales Short Form (DASS-21) questionnaire from baseline established in the last week before start of randomized treatment to week 14, 26, and 52, 9) Change of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) from start to week 14, 26, and 52, 10) Change in quality of life using the Veterans RAND (VR-12) questionnaire from baseline established in the last week before start of randomized treatment to week 14, 26, and 52, 11) Change in sleep quality using the Regensburg Insomnia Scale (RIS) from baseline established in the last week before start of randomized treatment to week 14, 26, and 52, 12) Change in pain score of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire from baseline established in the last week before start of randomized treatment to week 14, 26, and 52, 13) Area under NRS-curve until treatment week 5, 11, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 39, 43, 47, 52, 14) Change in VR-12 components (physical component summary PCS, mental component summary MCS) from baseline established in the last week before start of randomized treatment to week 14, 26, and 52, 15) Number of patients with rescue medication over the course of the clinical trial and within periods: until treatment week ≤5, ≤11, ≤14, ≤18, ≤22, ≤26, ≤30, ≤34, ≤43, ≤47, ≤52, 16) Number and severity of adverse events (AE)

Interventions

Sponsors

Cannaxan GmbH, Apurano Pharmaceuticals GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1) Change in pain level on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) between baseline and at treatment week 14 (end of first treatment phase) in comparison of study arm 1 (verum) and study arm 2 (placebo)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
2) Change in pain level on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) between baseline and at treatment week 26 (end of second treatment phase) in comparison of study arm 1 (verum) and study arm 2 (placebo), 3) Change in pain level on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) between baseline and at treatment week 52 (end of third treatment phase) in comparison of study arm 1 (verum) and study arm 2 (placebo), 4) Change in the pain score of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) questionnaire between baseline established in the last week before start of randomized treatment and at treatment week 14 (end of first treatment phase), at treatment week 26 (end of second treatment phase), and at treatment week 52 (end of third treatment phase) in comparison of study arm 1 (verum) and study arm 2 (placebo), 5) Change in pain level on the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) between baseline and in treatment week 5, 11, 18, 22, 30, 34, 43, 47 in comparison of study arm 1 (verum) and study arm 2 (placebo),

Countries

Austria, Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026