Skip to content

Impact of catheter removal practices on patient pain

Providing the evidence for surgical drain removal: A double blind randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of surgical drain removal practices on patient pain post-abdominal surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12626000816358
Enrollment
128
Registered
2026-07-08
Start date
2021-04-21
Completion date
2022-09-29
Last updated
2026-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Suction drainage catheters are routinely used after abdominal surgery to remove excess fluid. Neutralising suction before drain removal is essential to reduce pain, discomfort, and complications. A review identified two drain removal techniques used by nurses, but found no evidence supporting either method, particularly regarding patient pain or ease of removal. This nurse-led randomised controlled trial compared both techniques to determine the optimal approach based on patient and nurse experiences.

Interventions

The intervention compared two techniques used to release suction from a drain prior to removal: the Disconnecting technique and the Clamping technique. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in a hospital setting and included adult patients (aged over 18 years) who had undergone abdominal surgery with a suction drain inserted intraoperatively and scheduled for removal. An independent nurse, defined as a staff member with no active role in the patient’s care, had access to the ran

The intervention compared two techniques used to release suction from a drain prior to removal: the Disconnecting technique and the Clamping technique. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in a hospital setting and included adult patients (aged over 18 years) who had undergone abdominal surgery with a suction drain inserted intraoperatively and scheduled for removal. An independent nurse, defined as a staff member with no active role in the patient’s care, had access to the randomisation schedule. This independent nurse was responsible for either clamping or disconnecting the drain and then blinding the intervention from the patient, the nurse removing the drain, The research nurse conducted surveys to both the patient participant and the nurse participant before and after drain removal. The total duration of the disconecting technique, includes the independent nurse manually disconnecting the Bellovac® suction drainage tubing from the catheter (Jackson Pratt or Blake) and securing of opaque covering to blind the technique from the patient, research nurse and nurse removing the drain, This process would take one - two minutes. No training was necessary for the nurse removing the drain as this practice is common for a surgical ward nurse.

Sponsors

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Any patient over the age of 18 years with a temporary CSD at RPAH located on 7E1, 7E2 and 9E. Either a Jackson Pratt or a Blake catheter was placed intra-abdominally at the time of abdominal operation by a general surgeon (Colorectal, Upper GI or Transplant) and attached to a closed suction system, namely the Bellovac® (Mediplast Pty Ltd, Lindfield, Australia). Patients with a current CSD removal order from the treating surgical team that nurses could remove. Patients had to be willing and able to give informed consent. Only nurses attending to the patient's care at the time of CSD removal were approached to participate in the trial. Only ward nurses willing and able to give informed consent were approached.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with drains inserted in the subcutaneous tissue without entry into the abdominal cavity were excluded. Those patients who had consented to participation in another trial that might conflict with this trial’s objectives were excluded. Patients with a history of a psychological illness or other conditions that may interfere with their ability to understand the trial requirements and who are unable to give a valid consent were excluded. Nurses who did not understand the study requirements were excluded. Nurses without previous experience in CSD removal were not invited to participate. Nurses who were under accreditation and had not performed the procedure independently were also excluded from the study.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026