Skip to content

High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy after Planned Extubation in Post-Neurosurgical Acute Brain Injury: A Propensity Score–Matched Study

Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation Rates in Post-Neurosurgical Patients with Acute Brain Injury: A Propensity Score–Matched Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12626000796381
Enrollment
285
Registered
2026-07-02
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2026-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Summary: Patients after brain surgery often need help breathing with a machine. When the breathing tube is removed, they are at high risk of failing to breathe on their own. This study compares two ways of giving oxygen: a High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC), which provides warm and moist oxygen at high speeds, and standard oxygen masks. Hypothesis: We believe that using HFNC will be better at preventing patients from needing the breathing tube put back in (reintubation) compared to standard oxygen therapy. This research observed 285 patients at Bach Mai Hospital to see which method led to better recovery and fewer complications like pneumonia or the need for a neck tube (tracheostomy).

Interventions

This was an observational exposure, not an investigator-assigned intervention. Participants could receive HFNC regardless of their involvement in this study. The decision to use HFNC or conventional oxygen therapy after extubation was made independently by the attending ICU physicians according to routine clinical practice and the patient’s clinical condition. Study enrolment did not determine, restrict, or provide access to HFNC. Procedures: HFNC was initiated immediately after planned extubat

This was an observational exposure, not an investigator-assigned intervention. Participants could receive HFNC regardless of their involvement in this study. The decision to use HFNC or conventional oxygen therapy after extubation was made independently by the attending ICU physicians according to routine clinical practice and the patient’s clinical condition. Study enrolment did not determine, restrict, or provide access to HFNC. Procedures: HFNC was initiated immediately after planned extubation when selected by the treating physician. The initial flow rate was 60 L/min, with FiO2 titrated between 30–60% to maintain SpO2 between 95–100%. HFNC was planned to be continued for at least the first 24 hours after extubation. After 24 hours, the flow rate was reduced by 10 L/min every 6 hours as tolerated and discontinued when the patient remained clinically stable. The usual planned duration was 24–48 hours, with clinical outcomes assessed during the first 72 hours after extubation. Adherence assessment: HFNC use, initial settings, duration, weaning, discontinuation, escalation of respiratory support, and reintubation were assessed through prospective review of ICU medical records, bedside monitoring charts, and respiratory therapy/nursing documentation. Who delivered the exposure: HFNC was delivered by ICU physicians and nurses in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit as part of standard post-extubation care.

Sponsors

Bach Mai Hospital.
Lead SponsorHospital

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adult patients aged > 16 years .Admission post-neurosurgical due to acute brain injury (including traumatic brain injury, stroke).Requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours.Patients undergoing planned extubation.Successful completion of a Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) lasting 30–120 minutes.Adequate airway protection defined as an Airway Care Score (ACS) < 8 points.Neurological readiness: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 200 mmHg, PEEP < 7 cmH_2O).

Exclusion criteria

Pre-existing tracheostomy or known upper airway obstruction (e.g., stenosis or tumor). Suspected cerebrospinal fluid leak or complex skull base fracture. Unplanned self-extubation. Requirement for immediate prophylactic reintubation or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) prior to the initiation of the study protocol.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026