None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
We are conducting this online randomised trial to evaluate the effect of providing an additional explanatory imaging infographic alongside standard imaging reports to adults aged 18-50 years' understanding, treatment beliefs and intentions, information-seeking intentions, concern for symptom progression and confidence in managing hip pain conservatively. It is unclear how the way imaging findings are communicated influences patient understanding, worry, and willingness to engage with first-line physiotherapy treatment. Previous qualitative research suggests that focusing on structural patholoy alone may increase the perception that surgery is necessary course of treatment, potentially reducing engagement with conservative care, but this has not yet been tested experimentally. This study will compare two groups: both groups receive the same hypothetical hip pain scenario, then one group receives standard x-ray and MRI reports and the other receives the same reports plus an infographic explaining the imaging findings in clear, lay language that contextualises structural changes and emphasises the role of physiotherapy. Participants will then complete a nine-item purpose-built outcome survey assessing understanding, treatment beliefs and intentions, information-seeking intentions, concern about symptom progression and confidence in managing hip pain conservatively. The findings will provide insight into the effects of adding an infographic to standard imaging reports on patient understanding, treatment beliefs and intentions.
Interventions
All participants will be asked to read a brief, hypothetical scenario describing a person experiencing ongoing moderate hip pain that limits usual activities. Participants will then be randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1. Control group: Participants will receive standard diagnostic imaging X-ray and MRI reports describing structural findings consistent with morphology associated with FAI syndrome. 2. Intervention group: Participants will receive the same standard imaging reports, plus an additional imaging infographic designed to explain the imaging findings in lay language. This infographic provides context about what the structural changes mean, emphasising that these findings are common, not necessarily the sole cause of symptoms, and that physiotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment. The intervention materials were developed based on current clinical guidelines for FAI syndrome, and consumer feedback (physiotherapists and people with lived experience of FAI syndrome) on information preferences, and the infographic was adapted based on feedback from consumers. This intervention will be embedded within the single secure online Research Data Capture (REDCap) link. The hypothetical scenario and assigned materials will take approximately 10-20 minutes to review. Participants will be asked to check a box confirming they have reviewed required materials before progressing to the outcome survey. As this is an anonymous online survey, adherence to the intervention (i.e., review of materials in full) cannot be monitored or verified. However, the decision was made to provide no monetary incentive for participation to mitigate the risk of non-engaged or repeat submissions. The nine-item outcome survey will take no more than 20 minutes to complete, with nine questions related to their understanding of the imaging findings, information-seeking intentions, treatment beliefs and intentions (surgery and physiotherapy), concern about symptom progression, and confidence in managing their hip pain conservatively. The primary difference between groups lies in the provision of the additional explanatory infographic, aimed at improving patient understanding, reducing worry and supporting engagement with first-line conservative management.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
i) Adults aged 18-50 years with or without hip pain ii) Located in Australia at time of survey completion iii) understand written English
Exclusion criteria
Aside from meeting the inclusion criteria, there are no key exclusion criteria for this study