Skip to content

A comparison of how midclavicular catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) perform when used in adults who receive intravenous antibiotic treatment.

Comparison of adverse events with midclavicular catheters versus peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in adults receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT).

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12626000339358
Enrollment
136
Registered
2026-03-18
Start date
2026-03-19
Completion date
2027-10-18
Last updated
2026-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study aims to compare rates of complications, dwell time and treatment completion with midclavicular catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). We hypothesize that in adults, midclavicular catheters (MCCs) will be associated with lower rates of complications compared with PICCs, similar rates of treatment completion, and similar dwell time.

Interventions

Midclavicular catheters (MCCs) will be inserted as per standard clinical protocols in the Radiology department of the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH). MCCs will be inserted via ultrasound guidance using aseptic technique and the MCC tip will be confirmed with ultrasound. MCC insertion will be performed by one of the credentialled Registered Nurse PICC inserters who work within the PICC team in the Radiology department (usual practice). The RN PICC team insert more than 1000 PICCs per year. Only P

Midclavicular catheters (MCCs) will be inserted as per standard clinical protocols in the Radiology department of the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH). MCCs will be inserted via ultrasound guidance using aseptic technique and the MCC tip will be confirmed with ultrasound. MCC insertion will be performed by one of the credentialled Registered Nurse PICC inserters who work within the PICC team in the Radiology department (usual practice). The RN PICC team insert more than 1000 PICCs per year. Only PICC inserters with > 1 year experience will insert vascular access devices for this study. Group allocation: A pre-test post-test design will be used, Initially, 68 participants who have provided informed consent will receive a PICC (usual care). After recruitment of 68 participants with a PICC, the study will transition to using midclavicular catheters for the subsequent 68 participants. Frequency and duration: Participants will be included in the study once; hence they will receive one vascular access device (MCC). The duration that participants will have the MCC will be determined by their treatment needs as decided by their medical team. At 8 weeks electronic medical records will be used to determine how long they had the MCC. Some participants may still have the vascular access device in situ at that time.

Sponsors

Adelaide University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Primary purpose
Treatment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults 18 years or over requiring medium term venous access for antibiotics and the PICC team decide the infusion/medications are appropriate for a PICC or a Midclavicular catheter based on clinical assessment and Royal Adelaide Hospital guidelines.

Exclusion criteria

Participants with cognitive impairment who cannot provide informed consent

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026