Skip to content

Young adults’ experiences and recovery in Uspace’s transdiagnostic and OCD-specific inpatient programs: a mixed-methods study of outcomes for young people with complex mental health conditions.

Real-World Hypothesis Testing of Uspace Transdiagnostic and OCD-Specific Inpatient Programs for Young Adults with Complex Mental Health Conditions: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12626000087358
Acronym
U-INSPIRE
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2026-01-23
Start date
2026-02-02
Completion date
2028-12-29
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study looks at how well the Uspace inpatient programs help young people aged 16–30 with complex mental health conditions in real-world hospital care. All participants receive usual multidisciplinary treatment, and some may also use newer tools such as virtual reality therapies, MRI-guided brain stimulation (TMS), and a digital mental health literacy platform, when clinically appropriate and with consent. The main hypothesis is that an admission of up to three weeks at Uspace will be associated with improvements in anxiety, depression and OCD symptoms, better day-to-day functioning and quality of life, and reduced overall distress. The study also hypothesises that programs co-designed with young people and families will be experienced as acceptable and helpful, and that higher engagement with groups and the new technologies will be linked to greater symptom improvement. Outcomes are assessed using standard questionnaires and service-use data, without any random assignment to treatments.

Interventions

The study evaluates a package of non-drug interventions integrated into routine inpatient care at Uspace for young adults with complex mental health conditions, focusing on feasibility, safety, acceptability, and clinical outcomes over a typical admission episode. Patients are admitted to Uspace under a transdiagnostic, routine-care General Program, and an OCD diagnosis may sometimes be identified or confirmed only during their inpatient stay, after comprehensive assessment and multidisciplinar

The study evaluates a package of non-drug interventions integrated into routine inpatient care at Uspace for young adults with complex mental health conditions, focusing on feasibility, safety, acceptability, and clinical outcomes over a typical admission episode. Patients are admitted to Uspace under a transdiagnostic, routine-care General Program, and an OCD diagnosis may sometimes be identified or confirmed only during their inpatient stay, after comprehensive assessment and multidisciplinary review. This means a patient may enter the service as part of the “general” cohort and subsequently move into, or concurrently receive, OCD-specific interventions during the same admission. Arm 1: Standard Group Therapy Brief name: Standard transdiagnostic and OCD-specific group therapy. Materials: Structured psychoeducational handouts, worksheets (for example, DBT skills sheets), and group guidelines are provided in printed and digital formats to support learning and peer discussion. Procedures: Daily transdiagnostic groups focus on psychoeducation, emotional regulation, distress tolerance, interpersonal effectiveness, and peer support; for the OCD Program, additional psychoeducational and feedback groups for patients and families address OCD mechanisms, coping strategies, and service improvement. Participation is voluntary, with clear ground rules to support emotional safety and confidentiality. Who delivers: Qualified mental health clinicians (clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health nurses, and allied health staff) with experience in group therapy for young adults. Mode of delivery: In-person, face-to-face group sessions on the inpatient unit, with some family sessions optionally including telehealth participation where clinically appropriate. Number and timing: General Program: Typically 1–2 group sessions per weekday, 45–60 minutes each, across the duration of the inpatient stay (approximately 2–6 weeks, depending on clinical need). OCD Program: In addition to standard groups, OCD-specific psychoeducation and family sessions occur approximately once per fortnight during the admission, 60–90 minutes each. Location/setting: Uspace 20-bed young adult inpatient mental health unit at St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney (specialist early-intervention service for young adults). Adherence/fidelity: Attendance is recorded for each group; a standardised group program schedule and facilitator guides are used, and senior clinicians periodically review content and delivery to maintain fidelity to the therapeutic model. Arm 2: MRI-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Brief name: MRI-guided TMS for depression and OCD. Materials: MRI scanner and neuronavigation system to identify cortical targets, TGA-approved TMS device with magnetic coil, treatment chair, safety questionnaires, and adverse-event monitoring templates. Procedures: A baseline neurological and psychiatric assessment is completed, including standard safety screening. An MRI brain scan is used to localise target regions (for example, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for treatment-resistant depression and OCD-relevant targets as available), followed by courses of repetitive TMS according to standard clinical protocols, with real-time observation and recording of side effects. Courses may be delivered either by radiographers with advanced training or by psychiatrists/nurses, always under consultant psychiatrist supervision, with the operator recorded prospectively for each session. Who delivers: Consultant psychiatrists prescribe and supervise courses; TMS is administered by trained radiographers (linked radiology/TMS services) or Uspace psychiatrists/nurses with specific TMS training. Mode of delivery: In-person, one-to-one sessions at partnered radiology/TMS clinics; MRI is delivered in standard radiology suites. Number and timing: A typical course consists of approximately 20–30 sessions delivered 5 times per week over 4–6 weeks, with each TMS treatment session lasting about 20–40 minutes, consistent with routine clinical protocols. Location/setting: Uspace inpatient unit (for assessment, referral, and follow-up) and partnered MRI/TMS facilities (for example, external radiology/TMS providers). Adherence/fidelity: Treatment logs record session attendance, stimulation parameters, side effects, and operator; feasibility and fidelity are assessed by completeness of prescribed courses, adherence to protocol, documentation audits, and supervision with structured training resources to support operator competence. Arm 3: Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) and 2D Exposure Module (2DET) Brief name: Virtual reality and digital exposure therapy for OCD. Materials: VRET: VR headset, computer and software providing graded OCD-relevant exposure scenarios with adjustable intensity, and emergency stop controls. 2DET: A digital two-dimensional exposure module delivered via the secure MindSkiller platform or similar, using structured exposure tasks and psychoeducational content. Procedures: A structured exposure hierarchy is developed collaboratively with the clinician. VRET sessions expose participants to virtual OCD-relevant triggers in a graded fashion with response-prevention coaching and monitoring of subjective distress; emergency stop and intensity controls support safety. 2DET sessions guide participants through non-immersive, screen-based exposure exercises completed in-session or as supported tasks between sessions, integrated with routine OCD therapy. Who delivers: Clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, and other trained mental health clinicians with CBT/OCD expertise deliver and supervise VRET and 2DET sessions. Mode of delivery: VRET: Face-to-face, one-to-one sessions using VR hardware in therapy rooms on the ward. 2DET: Individual, digitally mediated exposure tasks accessed on ward computers or personal devices under clinician guidance. Number and timing: VRET: Typically 4–8 sessions per admission, 30–60 minutes per session, 1–2 times weekly depending on length of stay and clinical tolerance, commencing after assessment and consent. 2DET: Shorter, more frequent modules (for example, 2–3 times per week, 15–30 minutes each) embedded in the inpatient schedule, with optional follow-up use post-discharge. Location/setting: Uspace inpatient unit (therapy rooms or quiet spaces) using secure hardware and networked access to the software platform. Adherence/fidelity: Session logs capture attendance, scenario type, duration, distress ratings, and early termination; standardised exposure protocols and session checklists are used, and MindSkiller-linked tools allow monitoring of utilisation and symptom change over time. Arm 4: Virtual Reality Positive Memory Enhancement (VRPME) Brief name: VR-based AI-assisted positive memory enhancement for depression and anxiety. Materials: VR headset and software delivering immersive positive or soothing environments combined with AI-assisted therapeutic scripts guiding positive memory recall and cognitive re-scripting. Procedures: Participants engage in structured sessions in which they are prompted to recall and elaborate positive or mastery-oriented memories while immersed in tailored VR scenarios (for example, calming nature environments), with a clinician supporting emotion regulation and cognitive restructuring. Who delivers: Clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, or other trained mental health clinicians with experience in trauma-informed and cognitive therapies for young adults. Mode of delivery: Individual, face-to-face sessions using VR equipment in designated therapy spaces on the ward. Number and timing: Approximately 3–6 sessions per admission, 30–45 minutes each, usually 1–2 times per week depending on symptom severity, engagement, and length of stay. Location/setting: Uspace inpatient unit, in VR-capable therapy rooms or quiet spaces. Adherence/fidelity: Standard VRPME protocols and scripting templates are used; session notes document content, emotional responses, and any adverse events, and adverse event registers track side effects such as dizziness or nausea. Arm 5: Mental Health Literacy eLearning Platform (MindSkiller) Brief name: MindSkiller digital mental health literacy and research platform. Materials: MindSkiller online platform providing interactive psychoeducational modules, multimedia content, knowledge checks, and scenario-based learning for depression, anxiety, OCD, and transdiagnostic topics, as well as secure case report and outcome-measure modules for research data capture. Procedures: Participants complete tailored learning pathways on MindSkiller during admission (for example, diagnosis-specific modules, coping skills, treatment options), while clinicians review progress and link content to individual care plans; the platform concurrently collects symptom and functioning outcomes via standardised questionnaires. Who delivers: Content and oversight are provided by consultant psychiatrists and clinical psychologists with digital mental health expertise; ward clinicians encourage and support patient use. Mode of delivery: Digital, self-paced eLearning accessed individually on personal devices or ward computers, supported by brief face-to-face check-ins with clinicians as needed. Number and timing: Participants are encouraged to complete several core modules during their inpatient stay (for example, 3–6 modules, 20–40 minutes each) plus optional additional content, typically a few sessions per week aligned with individual capacity and length of stay. Location/setting: Uspace inpatient unit and, where feasible, post-discharge at home via secure login to the MindSkiller platform. Adherence/fidelity: Platform analytics track log-ins, duration of use, modules completed, and quiz performance; clinicians review engagement reports and prompt completion where appropriate, and standardised modules with version control ensure protocol consistency during the study period. Personalisation and Fidelity Across Arms Personalisation: All interventions are embedded in a person-centred inpatient model in which treatment plans are tailored to diagnosis, symptom severity, comorbidities, and patient preferences, with the intensity and combination of group therapy, TMS, VR/2DET, VRPME, and MindSkiller adjusted collaboratively in multidisciplinary meetings. Fidelity: Structured protocols, manuals, and digital pathways are used for each intervention, with routine documentation of attendance, dose, adverse events, and operator type (for example, radiographer versus psychiatrist/nurse for TMS), plus periodic supervision and audit by senior clinicians to support fidelity assessment.

Sponsors

St Vincent’s Health Network (St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney / Uspace)
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Other
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Eligible participants are young adults admitted to Uspace who can provide informed consent and complete study measures. In addition, some participants are initially admitted under the general, transdiagnostic inpatient program and, during the course of their admission, are identified as having clinically significant obsessive–compulsive symptoms or a formal OCD diagnosis following comprehensive psychiatric assessment and multidisciplinary review (including structured diagnostic interview, review of longitudinal history, and standardised symptom measures such as the Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale or equivalent clinician-rated tools). These participants may subsequently enter, or simultaneously receive, OCD-specific interventions within the same admission episode. Core inclusion criteria Age 16–30 years at the time of admission to Uspace. Current inpatient of Uspace, St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney, admitted to the General or OCD Program under routine clinical pathways. Sufficient English fluency to understand study information and complete questionnaires and digital modules. Capacity to provide informed consent to research participation, assessed according to hospital consent policy; for 16–17-year-olds, independent consent is permitted if capacity is demonstrated. Intervention-specific eligibility (summary) Eligibility for non-standard adjunctive interventions (e.g. MRI-guided TMS, VR therapies, 2D exposure modules) requires non-response or insufficient response to at least one guideline-endorsed evidence-based therapy (such as CBT and/or SSRI) for the relevant condition, documented in the clinical record. TMS interventions are limited to adults (18 years or older) under routine TGA approval; use in 16–17-year-olds, where considered, is on a case-by-case basis with enhanced consent.

Exclusion criteria

Key exclusion criteria focus on situations where participation would be unsafe, infeasible, or inconsistent with the study’s aims. Global study-level exclusions Inability to provide informed consent due to impaired decision-making capacity, acute cognitive impairment, or communication difficulties that prevent understanding of study information and completion of questionnaires, even with support. Patients whose admission pathway does not meet Uspace’s standardised intake inclusion/exclusion criteria for the 16–30-year-old inpatient service (e.g. primary need for a different level of care or service type). Decline or withdrawal of consent for research use of routine clinical data (clinical care continues, but data are not included in the study). Intervention-specific safety and feasibility exclusions TMS-specific exclusions: patients with known contraindications to MRI or TMS (e.g. seizure disorder, non-compatible metal implants, or other standard TMS safety red flags), and all patients under 16 years; use in 16–17-year-olds is restricted to exceptional, case-by-case circumstances and otherwise considered unsuitable. VR / digital exposure / VRPME exclusions: patients with conditions that make immersive or screen-based interventions unsafe or impractical (e.g. epilepsy, severe motion sickness, severe dissociation or psychosis that would be destabilised by VR, or inability to use digital interfaces). Exclusions related to prior treatment and indication For novel, non-standard adjunctive interventions (e.g. MRI-guided TMS, VRET, 2D exposure modules), patients without documented non-response to at least one guideline-endorsed evidence-based therapy (CBT and/or SSRI) for the relevant diagnosis are excluded from those specific arms, as the study targets treatment-refractory or complex presentations.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026