Skip to content

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the ROMAX Resurfacing System in patients undergoing hip resurfacing.

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the ROMAX Resurfacing System in patients undergoing hip resurfacing

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12625000948493
Enrollment
1
Registered
2025-08-29
Start date
2025-11-17
Completion date
2026-09-15
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of the ROMAX Resurfacing System in primary hip resurfacing. This will be achieved by assessing survivorship and collecting patient reported outcome measures from patients receiving the ROMAX resurfacing system. Patient clinical and radiographic outcomes will be analysed pre-implantation and post-implantation through to 3 years. The hypothesis is that the 2-year cumulative percent revision of the ROMAX resurfacing system is not inferior to the performance of other resurfacing systems currently on the Australian market.

Interventions

Patients with degenerative hip diseases may be candidates for either a total hip replacement or a hip resurfacing surgical intervention. In comparison to a total hip replacement, where the femoral head is removed and replaced by an implant, hip resurfacing preserves the femoral head of the patient. As a result of minimising the resection of the patient’s bone, hip resurfacing is associated with a greater preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur. The ROMAX Resurfacing System is a h

Patients with degenerative hip diseases may be candidates for either a total hip replacement or a hip resurfacing surgical intervention. In comparison to a total hip replacement, where the femoral head is removed and replaced by an implant, hip resurfacing preserves the femoral head of the patient. As a result of minimising the resection of the patient’s bone, hip resurfacing is associated with a greater preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur. The ROMAX Resurfacing System is a hip resurfacing system that is designed to be utilised during a resurfacing procedure of the hip. A hip resurfacing procedure takes approximately 1.5 hours to 3 hours and the device is administered/implanted by an orthopaedic surgeon. The electornic medical records and study related documents will be assessed to monitor the adherence to the intervention. The ROMAX resurfacing system is not yet approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). However, it has received a class III CE mark in 2021. The implant is designed to provide an artificial substitute for a disease-damaged hip joint to replace the articulating surfaces of the hip while preserving the underlying femoral head and natural femoral neck. The acetabular component is designed for a cementless implantation, thereby having a highly porous titanium coating for increased fixation to the bone. The acetabular component is also made up of a thin shell, allowing for a bone preserving design with adequate stiffness. The acetabular is lined with a vitamin E crosslinked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liner to prevent metal-on-metal bearing to reduce the risk of metal ion release. The femoral resurfacing head is designed for a cemented fixation on the prepared native femoral head.

Sponsors

Medacta Australia Pty Ltd
Lead SponsorCommercial sector/Industry

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Primary purpose
Treatment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Patients scheduled for hip resurfacing, suitable for implantation of a Medacta ROMAX hip resurfacing system according to the manufacturer's indication for use. - Skeletally mature adults aged 18 years and over at the time of surgery. - Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent for participation. - Primary diagnosis of non-Inflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease

Exclusion criteria

- Not meeting the inclusion criteria. - The subject is classified as morbidly obese (BMI greater than 40) - Previous hip resurfacing, replacement or fusion on affected side - Active infection in the affected joint - Intra-articular fracture - Workers’ compensation patients or currently in any injury litigation claims - Individuals who, for any clinical reason, are deemed unable to provide informed consent. - Severely distorted anatomy (at surgeon's discretion) - Osteomalacia where the fixation of an uncemented implant is contraindicated - Osteoporosis. - Metabolic disorders that may impair bone formation and for which the attachment of an uncemented implant is contraindicated - Muscle atrophy or neuromuscular disease - Known allergy or hypersensitivity to the implant material - Patients whose chances of regaining independent mobility would be compromised by known concomitant medical problems.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026