Skip to content

Efficacy of Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) vs Mulligan Technique for Nonspecific Neck Pain in Older Adults

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) versus Mobilization with Movement (MWM) in Older Adults with Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12625000809437
Enrollment
75
Registered
2025-07-29
Start date
2025-08-11
Completion date
2025-09-29
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of IASTM and MWM techniques versus a no-treatment control group in older adults with nonspecific neck pain. The trial evaluates disability, mobility, pain intensity, and quality of life. Interventions will be delivered once a week for six weeks. Results will inform non-pharmacological options for pain management in the elderly.

Interventions

Arm 1 – IASTM Group: Participants will receive an Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) protocol consisting of five structured phases applied to the upper trapezius muscle. The five phases are: Passive IASTM mobilization Active movement during IASTM application Resisted movement during IASTM application Proprioceptive stimulation using closed kinetic chain tasks (e.g., pushing a stability ball against the wall at 90° shoulder flexion) Return to calm through passive IASTM mobi

Arm 1 – IASTM Group: Participants will receive an Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) protocol consisting of five structured phases applied to the upper trapezius muscle. The five phases are: Passive IASTM mobilization Active movement during IASTM application Resisted movement during IASTM application Proprioceptive stimulation using closed kinetic chain tasks (e.g., pushing a stability ball against the wall at 90° shoulder flexion) Return to calm through passive IASTM mobilization Each session lasts approximately 30 minutes, and the protocol is applied once per week for 6 weeks. Sessions are delivered in a one-on-one format, administered by a licensed physiotherapist trained in IASTM application. The setting is a physiotherapy clinic in the Biobío region of Chile. Fidelity monitoring will be performed through a session checklist, therapist documentation of completed steps, and participant attendance logs. Arm 2 – MWM Group: Participants will receive treatment based on the Mulligan concept, which incorporates Mobilization with Movement (MWM) techniques. The protocol includes: Natural Apophyseal Glides (NAGs): Low-velocity central mobilizations in seated position Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs): Combined therapist-applied glides with active cervical movements (e.g., flexion, extension, side bending) Manual and belt-assisted distraction techniques in supine position Functional movement retraining with overpressure A typical session lasts approximately 30 minutes, and treatment is provided once per week for 6 weeks. Interventions are administered by a physiotherapist certified in the Mulligan concept, delivered in a one-on-one format at a physiotherapy clinic in the Biobío region. To ensure procedural fidelity, a standardized treatment protocol will be followed, with therapists completing structured documentation of techniques performed and patient response, alongside attendance logs.

Sponsors

Universidad Europea de Madrid
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
60 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Barthel Index score > 61 Nonspecific neck pain Negative Spurling and Jackson tests

Exclusion criteria

Uncontrolled or decompensated comorbidities Cognitive impairment interfering with evaluations

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026