Skip to content

Brain-Informed Tailored Interventions for Alcohol Use Disorder

Evaluating the effect of neural network modelling informed personalized brain stimulation on alcohol consumption in individuals with moderate to severe alcohol use disorder

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12625000792426
Enrollment
129
Registered
2025-07-25
Start date
2025-08-04
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study aims to improve treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD) by matching brain stimulation interventions with brain imaging informed neural network profiles (or subtypes). Using a novel neuroimaging-informed approach, we will identify which brain network is most affected in each individual and provide a subtype-matched brain stimulation intervention targeted to that network. We will assess changes in drinking behaviours through self-report and biological markers (blood and hair samples). We will also measure changes in brain activity, and cognitive, affective, and decision-making skills to better understand how the intervention works. We hypothesise that matching the intervention to the individual’s brain network subtype will lead to better outcomes than a one-size-fits-all approach.

Interventions

Background: Interventions comprise different non-invasive brain stimulation approaches. The specific intervention each participant receives will be determined by brain imaging analyses. Participants will undergo a functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan prior to intervention allocation, in which brain network function will be assessed using resting-state fMRI. The fMRI time series will be analyzed using spectral dynamic causal modeling (spDCM) to estimate individual-level features of e

Background: Interventions comprise different non-invasive brain stimulation approaches. The specific intervention each participant receives will be determined by brain imaging analyses. Participants will undergo a functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan prior to intervention allocation, in which brain network function will be assessed using resting-state fMRI. The fMRI time series will be analyzed using spectral dynamic causal modeling (spDCM) to estimate individual-level features of effective connectivity in a predefined network of interest comprising Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC), Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex (VMPFC), Insula, and Striatum. The resulting parameters will be incorporated into a generative embedding framework to classify participants with AUD into biotypes based on the following subnetworks: 1. ‘Ventromedial stream’: Altered connectivity in the VMPFC subnetwork. 2. ‘Dorsolateral stream’: Altered connectivity in the DLPFC subnetwork. A machine learning derived classification method will then determine the participant's subtype and appropriate biotype-matched intervention. Participants will be biotyped as ‘Ventromedial stream’ or ‘Dorsolateral stream’, and allocated to personalized VMPFC (Arm 1) or DLPFC (Arm 2) brain stimulation interventions, respectively. Duration: Participants will complete 5 consecutive stimulation days. Four intervention doses are provided on each day, with a 50-minute break between each administration. Therefore an intervention day will be 3-4 hours long. Baseline and outcome data will be collected during neurocognitive sessions conducted at three timepoints: baseline, immediately post-intervention, and Day 90. These sessions will run for approximately 6-8 hours, including a lunch break, with total duration dependent on task completion speed and participant preference for additional breaks. The primary alcohol consumption outcome will be assessed separately at Day 30 in a dedicated 1-hour session. The duration for each iTBS dose is approximately 7 minutes, the duration for each cTBS dose is approximately 3 minutes, and the duration for the sham dose is 5 minutes. Mode of delivery: Face-to-face administration, provided individually to each participant. Materials: The interventions will be delivered using Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (dTMS). As a result, the administration structure in both arms is identical, except for differences in stimulation parameters and resting motor threshold protocol. Arm 1: To modify altered connectivity in the 'Ventromedial stream', continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) over the VMPFC will be applied. cTBS will be administered using the H7 Brainsway coil targeting the vmPFC positioned 4 cm anterior to the motor hotspot using standardized localization procedures (Isserles et al., 2021). Arm 2: To modify altered connectivity in the 'Dorsolateral stream', intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) over the dlPFC will be applied. iTBS will be administered using the H1 Brainsway coil targeting the dlPFC, positioned 6 cm anterior to the motor hotspot, using standardized localization procedures (Feifel et al., 2016; Pell et al., 2022). Intervention administrators: The administration of these interventions will be conducted exclusively by a dTMS clinician. Here, a dTMS clinician is defined as an individual holding a PhD or possessing equivalent expertise in neuromodulation, demonstrated by a minimum of three years of relevant experience, or an individual who has undergone specific training and is operating under the direct supervision of the neurostimulation leads, who each have ten years of experience in the field. Intervention dosage: In both arms, before the administration of dTMS, resting motor threshold (RMT) for each participant will be determined. The RMT is the minimum stimulation intensity required to elicit visible motor responses from 3 out of 6 pulses. The site of motor response (foot in Arm 1, hand in Arm 2) is determined by the coil used in each arm per standard Brainsway protocol. The dose of dTMS will be set based on a percentage of each individual's RMT, following standardised procedures. RMT is followed by a short adaptation procedure, to ensure participants are comfortable with the stimulation intensity. The adaptation procedure will involve exposing the participant to a short train (~2 s for iTBS, 4 s for cTBS) of the dTMS protocol at a reduced intensity to acclimate the participant. Arm 1: dTMS will be administered at 80% of foot RMT. The cTBS protocol will consist of two trains of a standard cTBS sequence (per Huang et al., 2005), with a 30-second intertrain interval. Each train will consist of 600 pulses, comprising three-pulse bursts at 50Hz repeated every 200ms (5Hz) for 40 seconds. Arm 2: dTMS will be administered at 100% of hand RMT. The iTBS protocol will consist of three-pulse bursts at 50Hz repeated every 200ms (5Hz) for 2 seconds, with an 8-second intertrain interval, for 40 trains (1200 pulses). Intervention adherence/fidelity and tolerance: Adherence to the interventions will be measured by tracking participants’ attendance across the 20 stimulation doses. We will use standard pre and post stimulation interviews to monitor tolerability, track session attendance, and assess barriers to adherence, such as participant discomfort, through feedback gathered during and after the sessions. Adherance will be monitored via a REDCap tool that is completed for each dose to track dose completion and intensity. Participants must complete a minimum of 4 days of the intervention (this involves 16 sessions), with no more than 3 consecutive days between any two sessions. Participants must receive at least 16 total stimulation doses across all sessions. Treatment intensity must meet the following thresholds: - In Session 1, the average intensity across all doses must be within 30% of the target intensity. - In all subsequent Sessions, the average intensity across doses must be within 10% of the target intensity. - All sessions must be completed within a maximum treatment window of 9 calendar days. - These treatment intensity thresholds were informed by a pilot study, where iTBS (with a target intensity of 100%) was delivered at an average of 95%, and cTBS (with a target intensity of 80%) was delivered at an average of 70%. Therefore, the target of within 10% across sessions should be feasible for both intervention arms, especially considering the capacity to titrate intensity up across doses.

Sponsors

Monash University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Other
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Meet DSM-5 criteria for moderate-severe AUD in past 12 months Aged 18-49 years Can attend five non-invasive brain stimulation sessions and three assessment sessions in Clayton, Victoria. Willing to abstain from alcohol 36 hours before each neurocognitive and intervention session. Willing to abstain from recreational drugs 7 days prior to each neurocognitive and intervention session. Consent to nominate a GP to receive details of any incidental findings Willing to nominate an emergency contact for intervention sessions. Have consumed alcoholic beverages in the past 90 days

Exclusion criteria

Any MRI contraindication such as ferromagnetic metal in the head, brain surgery or implanted medical devices Body weight of >250 kg (upper limit of MRI scanner) Co-occurrence of serious or unstable mental disorders that can substantially interfere with the study protocols and therapeutic goals, such as psychosis, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorders (ascertained with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID)/ Quick Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (QuickSCID-5). Self-reported history of brain trauma with loss-of-consciousness >30 minutes or any loss of consciousness in the past 6 months, seizures/epilepsy, neurodegenerative illnesses or any other neurological condition associated with severe cognitive impairment as indicated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MOCA) as these conditions can impact the safety and/or reduce the efficacy of the study. Currently taking anti-craving medications (e.g., bupropion) that can mask or amplify the effects of the study. Currently taking any dosage of medication that may interfere with safety of the intervention (i.e., high-dose diazepam, clozapine). Not accessing formal treatment for alcohol use disorder currently, or within the past 28 days, and not planning to commence formal treatment for alcohol use disorder in the next 28 days.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026