Skip to content

Validating Intensive Care Risk Scoring Tests in the Oldest Patients admitted to Intensive Care

Validity of ICU Prognostic Risk Stratification Tools in the Oldest Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Scores in a Multicenter Binational Cohort

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12625000775415
Enrollment
40910
Registered
2025-07-23
Start date
2025-04-14
Completion date
2025-06-21
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This retrospective, observational cohort study will include nonagenarians admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2010 and 2023 across Australia and New Zealand. The study will utilise data from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Adult Patient Database. Who is it for? You are eligible if you are greater than 90 years old and admitted to ICU. Patients will be categorised into those with a normal body mass index and thiose with either a high or low body mass index. Study details This study will evaluate and compare the prognostic performance of common ICU risk stratification scores including the APACHE III, SOFA, and ANZROD scores in a large binational cohort of ICU-admitted nonagenarians and centenarians. Discriminative ability, risk stratification, and predictive utility for both short- and long-term mortality will be assessed. We hope these findings will emphasise the importance of shared decision-making that respects patient autonomy and considers clinical, cultural, and systemic factors.

Interventions

In this study we will be comparing the performance of four ICU risk prediction tools: Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III, its derived risk of death (APACHE3ROD), the Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death (ANZROD), and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in predicting mortality among nonagenarian and centenarian ICU patients. All these scores are entered as a routine data entry points in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Adult Patient Dat

In this study we will be comparing the performance of four ICU risk prediction tools: Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III, its derived risk of death (APACHE3ROD), the Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death (ANZROD), and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in predicting mortality among nonagenarian and centenarian ICU patients. All these scores are entered as a routine data entry points in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Adult Patient Database. They will be collected directly from the registry. The time period from which patient data will be collected from the database is between 1 Jan 2010 and 31 Dec 2023. The ANZROD model estimates the risk of hospital mortality for ICU patients in Australia and New Zealand. It uses physiological and clinical data from the first 24 hours after ICU admission to provide a risk-adjusted benchmark for outcomes, allowing meaningful comparisons between ICU. The APACHE Score is calculated by combining points assigned to abnormal values of various physiological measurements, patient age, and chronic health status collected within the first 24 hours of ICU admission. The SOFA Score is calculated by scoring the degree of dysfunction across six organ systems (respiratory, cardiovascular, liver, coagulation, kidney, and neurological), with higher scores reflecting greater organ failure severity. The APACHE3ROD score is calculated by integrating several components collected within the first 24 hours of a patient’s admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). The calculation combines points assigned to the most abnormal values from a broad range of physiological variables (such as vital signs and laboratory results), patient age, and pre-existing chronic health conditions. Additional factors—including the primary reason for ICU admission and the patient’s location prior to ICU entry—are incorporated. This composite score is then entered into a specific mathematical equation, producing an estimated risk of hospital mortality for the individual patient. The APACHE3ROD model is widely used for severity adjustment, benchmarking, and research in critical care outcomes in Australia and internationally Primary outcome: The primary outcome will be the comparative predictive performance of the ANZROD model, and SOFA, APACHE3ROD and APACHE III scoring systems for short-term and long-term mortality among nonagenarian and centenarian ICU patients. Predictive performance will be assessed with three key metrics: 1. Discrimination, measured with the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) 2. Calibration, assessed with observed-to-expected mortality comparisons via Standardised Mortality Ratios (SMRs); and 3. Clinical utility, evaluated through ity comparisons via Standardised Mortality Ratios (SMRs); and evaluated through decision curve analysis to quantify net benefit across a range of threshold probabilities. Data will be extracted directly from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Adult Patient Database for patients admitted to the ICU between 1 Jan 2010 and 31 Dec 2023.

Sponsors

Austin Health
Lead SponsorGovernment body

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
90 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria will be patients aged >90 years who require an admission to the ICU for any indication.

Exclusion criteria

None

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026