Skip to content

Effect of self-implemented sliding versus tensioning neurodynamic techniques on objective and subjective parameters in adults with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Effect of self-implemented sliding versus tensioning neurodynamic techniques on objective and subjective parameters in adults with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12625000460404
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-05-15
Start date
2025-06-01
Completion date
2025-11-01
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Assess the effectiveness of manual therapy including sliding versus tensioning neurodynamic techniques in the conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. We hypothesised that the use of sliding and tensioning neurodynamic techniques would be effective in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Interventions

Arm.1 – Group 1 (manual therapy) –carpal tunnel syndrome treatment will use manual therapy based on self-implemented sliding neurodynamic techniques. The therapy will be performed independently by the patient in the form of self-therapy. a. Sliding neurodynamic techniques for median nerve; position supine; neurodynamic sequence: arm adduction 90 degree and external rotation, wrist and finger extension, forearm supination, elbow extension; neurodynamic technique: one-direction proximal slide mobi

Arm.1 – Group 1 (manual therapy) –carpal tunnel syndrome treatment will use manual therapy based on self-implemented sliding neurodynamic techniques. The therapy will be performed independently by the patient in the form of self-therapy. a. Sliding neurodynamic techniques for median nerve; position supine; neurodynamic sequence: arm adduction 90 degree and external rotation, wrist and finger extension, forearm supination, elbow extension; neurodynamic technique: one-direction proximal slide mobilisation (movement – rhythmically elbow flexion and extension –large amplitude of motion), one-direction distal slide mobilisation (movement – rhythmically wist flexion and extension –large amplitude of motion). Physiotherapist will be providing instructions to enable participants to self-implement the techniques, the level of intensity – moderate, standard protocol consisted of ten series of 60 repetitions neurodynamic techniques separated by inter-series intervals of 1 minute. The duration of one therapy session will be approximately 30 minutes. The session will be performed in the patient’s home. Strategies used to assess or monitor adherence to the intervention – exercise diaries, reminder and telephone check-up by a physiotherapist. The therapy will be administered 5 times a week for 2 weeks (10 therapeutic sessions in total).

Sponsors

The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice
Lead SponsorGovernment body

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed clinically and neurophysiologically by specialist - Subjective and objective symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome - No other diseases that could affect the test results - No contraindications to therapy - Consent to participate in research

Exclusion criteria

- Lack of consent - Lack of cooperation from the patient - Contraindications to therapy - No symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome - Previous surgical treatment - Other causes of symptoms - Mental illness

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026