Skip to content

A randomised controlled trial comparing online imagery rescripting and psychoeducation on self-compassion among young people who are at risk of developing an eating disorder

A randomised controlled trial comparing online imagery rescripting and psychoeducation on self-compassion among young people who are at risk of developing an eating disorder

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12624001388505
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-11-22
Start date
2024-11-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study aims to examine (1) the efficacy of using body imagery rescripting to improve self-compassion compared to psychoeducation, and (2) the underlying mechanism of body image rescripting as a single-session intervention for self-compassion. Previous research has shown that body imagery rescripting increases self-compassion more than a psychoeducation task, while also reducing disordered eating, and improving body acceptance (Pennesi & Wade, 2018; Zhou et al., 2020). However, the mechanism behind these effects remains unclear. Understanding the mechanisms of such effective single-session intervention can shed light on specific targets to address in eating disorder early intervention and treatment.

Interventions

Body imagery rescripting: Body imagery rescripting is a therapeutic technique where people rescript an unpleasant visual memory where they might have felt ashamed or embarrassed of their bodies or how their bodies look in a compassionate way. It involves three steps: (1) Reliving (i.e., identify problematic memory; 5 minutes). A person visualize a recent event of an unpleasant body experience where they might have felt ashamed or embarrassed of their bodies or how their bodies look. An examp

Body imagery rescripting: Body imagery rescripting is a therapeutic technique where people rescript an unpleasant visual memory where they might have felt ashamed or embarrassed of their bodies or how their bodies look in a compassionate way. It involves three steps: (1) Reliving (i.e., identify problematic memory; 5 minutes). A person visualize a recent event of an unpleasant body experience where they might have felt ashamed or embarrassed of their bodies or how their bodies look. An example could be peer teasing or negative comments with respect to appearance, or feeling uncomfortable when looking in the mirror. Then they are asked to hold on to or reflect on the feelings they have during this imagery, and identify the earliest event they could remember associated with those feelings. They then write down as much details as possible about this earlier event, in first person, as if it were happening to them “right now”. Immediately after induction, participants complete a brief questionnaire that contains only the state measures in order to assess the impact of the induction. (2) Observing (5 minutes). Participants are asked to imagine and then write about the same memory (i.e., the earliest event) but from an observer's point of view (i.e., in third person), watching what happened to their younger self as it unfolds. Prompts are provided at the end of the writing task for participants to reflect upon what needs to happen in the memory in order for the younger self to feel better or if there’s anything the adult self would like to do to help the younger self in that situation. (3) Rescripting (5 minutes). Participants will then asked to re-imagine the same event in first person, but this time the wiser and more compassionate adult self is with them who can intervene the situation if they want her to. Participants are asked to write about what happened this time with the adult compassionate self presence in as much details as possible. All questionnaires, study instruction and interventions will be delivered online. Participants will receive instructions on body imagery rescripting on a computer screen. And they will be asked to type their responses (e.g., their rescripted memory) in a text box. A quality rating scale has been previously developed to assess intervention fidelity on all three steps of imagery rescripting intervention and will be used to rate fidelity based on participants' typed responses for imagery rescripting. The intervention will be delivered once at baseline (i.e., a single session intervention), and participants will be instructed to do homework (i.e., practice the rescripting step of the imagery rescripting once per day). The duration of the single session intervention will take around 30 minutes. The overall duration of the homework component (i.e., the rescripting step of the imagery rescripting) will be 20 minutes (4 X 5 minutes).

Sponsors

Flinders University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Primary purpose
Treatment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Anyone aged 18 -25 years, who were at risk of developing an eating disorder, as indicated by a score on the Weight Concern Scale (WCS; Killen et al., 1994) >= 47, considered a cut-off with good predictive validity for eating disorder cases (Jacobi, Abascal, & Taylor, 2004; Killen et al., 1994; 1996), will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Currently engaged with treatment of an eating disorder or eating disorder concerns

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026