Skip to content

The effect of manual therapy on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion: A pilot crossover randomised trial

The effect of ankle joint mobilisation and calf muscle massage on ankle joint dorsiflexion range of motion in individuals with restricted ankle dorsiflexion: A pilot crossover randomised trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12623001243606
Enrollment
25
Registered
2023-12-01
Start date
2017-08-16
Completion date
2018-10-05
Last updated
2023-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Ankle stiffness has been identified as a risk factor for lower limb injuries in sport. This randomised crossover control trial will investigate if ankle dorsiflexion can be increased with manual therapy. The participants will be required to attend two sessions of one hour, one week apart. Over the two sessions, participants will receive an intervention to address ankle joint stiffness and one to address calf muscle length. Measurements of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion will be taken before and after each intervention.

Interventions

Passive accessory mobilisation of the ankle joint Materials: treatment plinth, stop watch. Procedures: Participants were randomised to receive ankle joint mobilisation in the first session and calf massage in the second session, or calf massage in the first session and ankle joint mobilisation in the second session. Attendance at both sessions was confirmed by an attendance checklist. There was a washout period of one to two weeks between intervention sessions. At each session, ankle dorsifl

Passive accessory mobilisation of the ankle joint Materials: treatment plinth, stop watch. Procedures: Participants were randomised to receive ankle joint mobilisation in the first session and calf massage in the second session, or calf massage in the first session and ankle joint mobilisation in the second session. Attendance at both sessions was confirmed by an attendance checklist. There was a washout period of one to two weeks between intervention sessions. At each session, ankle dorsiflexion ROM for both ankles was measured pre- and post-intervention. Passive accessory mobilisation was applied to both ankles. Participants sat in a reclined supine position with their foot over the end of the plinth and the therapist applied a rhythmic mobilisation to the talocrural joint in a posterior to anterior direction. For subtalar mobilisation, the participant laid on one side with the lateral aspect of the ankle uppermost at the edge of the plinth. A medial glide of the calcaneus with respect to the talus was applied. The participant then laid on their other side with the medial aspect of the ankle uppermost and a lateral glide of the calcaneus was applied with respect to the talus. Grade III mobilisations were applied to joints and in directions of stiffness (hypomobility). Grade II mobilisations were applied to joints where no restriction was felt, or joints were hypermobile. The intervention consisted of 2-4 sets of 30 seconds each at approximately one mobilisation per second, with an interval of 10 seconds between sets. For hypermobile joints, 2 sets of 30 seconds using a Grade II was applied and for restricted joints, 3-4 sets of 30 seconds using a Grade III was applied. Time for the intervention was 5 minutes. Who: The manual therapy interventions were performed by a physiotherapist with more than 20 years of musculoskeletal physiotherapy experience. Mode of delivery: In person / face-to face Number of times: a single session. Location: Laboratory setting at a regional Australian university.

Sponsors

Dr Carolyn Taylor
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants were eligible if they were adults between the age of 18 and 65 years of age, fluent in English, and had a previous lower limb injury, including ankle sprains and fractures. There were no limitations placed on the type or severity of injury.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria were: if there was a lower leg soft tissue injury within the last 3 months, a lower limb fracture within the previous 12 months, or if they had pins, plates or screws in situ as a result of a lower limb fracture, if participants were taking antithrombotic medication, had a lower limb neurological condition that caused a loss of sensation or were allergic to low-allergy massage cream.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026