Skip to content

Gait analysis and shoe recommendation for recreational runners

Effects of shoe recommendation based on gait analysis on comfort, performance, and injury in recreational runners

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12623000516684
Enrollment
21
Registered
2023-05-19
Start date
2023-05-08
Completion date
2023-05-18
Last updated
2023-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of gait analysis-derived shoe prescription on running shoe comfort, injury reduction, and performance in three shoe conditions. The study aims to further identify how runners choose their shoes. We hypothesize that runners will find shoes prescribed based on gait analysis more comfortable than their own shoes and a sham 'basic' shoe.

Interventions

TIDieR checklist: How does shoe recommendation based on gait analysis influence subjective measures of comfort, performance, and injury prevention? Runners will participate in a gait analysis reflecting common in-store practices. The gait analysis will take approximately 10 minutes at the beginning of the intervention and will include shoe wear pattern assessment, foot measurement with a Brannock device, standing, walking, and running over a pressure sensor mat, and single leg squats. They wi

TIDieR checklist: How does shoe recommendation based on gait analysis influence subjective measures of comfort, performance, and injury prevention? Runners will participate in a gait analysis reflecting common in-store practices. The gait analysis will take approximately 10 minutes at the beginning of the intervention and will include shoe wear pattern assessment, foot measurement with a Brannock device, standing, walking, and running over a pressure sensor mat, and single leg squats. They will then be randomly assigned in a repeated measures study design two identical shoe constructions, albeit masked by color and deceived into believing that they are using different shoes. Runners will be randomly assigned shoe order (control and experimental) and receive informational descriptions as part of the intervention (basic/recommended shoe). Runners will be convinced that one shoe is a basic shoe that can be used in distance running, while the other shoe from the lab will be matched to their individual running style based on their gait analysis. Surveys after each running bout will be collected using Qualtrics offline surveys on an iPad to rate their experience. Runners will use their own shoes as a washout period after each experimental condition within the single session (5 mins running, 5 minutes rest). Runners will also complete a final ranking survey comparing each of the shoes. Basic shoe: This shoe model is quite basic. It is a generic shoe that doesn’t necessarily match your foot shape or running style. Basically, it CAN be used for distance running, but it is not specifically suited to you. Recommended shoe: Based on all the tests we did and the 6 pairs of shoes we have in the lab, this pair is the best option for you to maximize your comfort. Since this shoe matches your foot shape and running style, it will be extra comfortable when you run. We know from research that when a shoe is super comfortable and matches your body and running style, it usually leads to better performance and lower injury risk. The primary researcher will conduct all participant interventions and has a background in sports science research. Participants will interact face to face for a single session after being recruited via clubs, stores, and word of mouth. The intervention will occur at the University of Waikato Adam's center for sport performance in the university lab. Participants will run 4 bouts after a brief warm up, 5 minutes each bout. They will only experience the intervention (gait analysis) once in their single session visit prior to running in shoe conditions. The total session length is approximately 1 hour.

Sponsors

University of Waikato
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Educational / counselling / training
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Runners are eligible to participate if they road run at least once weekly for at least one month.

Exclusion criteria

Runners that have been injured within the month prior to enrolment based on the following consensus definition: Running related (training or competition) musculoskeletal pain in the lower limbs that causes a restriction on or stoppage of running (distance, speed, duration, or training) for at least 7 days or 3 consecutive scheduled training sessions, or that requires the runner to consult a physician or other health professional.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026