Skip to content

Effect of low volume vs. standard oral nutrition supplements on nutrition intakes and supplement wastage in hospital: a pilot comparative effectiveness trial

Effect of low volume vs. standard oral nutrition supplements on nutrition intakes and supplement wastage in hospital: a pilot comparative effectiveness trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12623000503628
Acronym
N/A
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-05-17
Start date
2023-05-29
Completion date
2023-08-31
Last updated
2023-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The purpose of this pilot comparative effectiveness trial is to estimate the standard deviation of the primary outcome (% grams wastage of oral nutrition supplements (ONS) among hospital patients) for a larger definitive trial.

Interventions

Oral nutrition supplements - Fortisip Compact Protein This is a pilot comparative effectiveness trial of low volume oral nutrition supplements (Fortisip Compact Protein, 2 x 125mL/day) vs standard oral nutrition supplements (Ensure Plus, 2 x 200mL/day). The dose of the intervention product (Fortisip Compact Protein) is 125mL twice daily. The duration of its administration is 3-4 days (depending on hospital inpatients' length of stay). The mode is oral solution (milky-type drink). A research ass

Oral nutrition supplements - Fortisip Compact Protein This is a pilot comparative effectiveness trial of low volume oral nutrition supplements (Fortisip Compact Protein, 2 x 125mL/day) vs standard oral nutrition supplements (Ensure Plus, 2 x 200mL/day). The dose of the intervention product (Fortisip Compact Protein) is 125mL twice daily. The duration of its administration is 3-4 days (depending on hospital inpatients' length of stay). The mode is oral solution (milky-type drink). A research assistant will monitor adherence by collecting and weighing supplement drink containers after patient consumption. The intervention supplement differs to the standard supplement by volume (125mL vs 200mL) and protein content (18g per serve vs 12.5g per serve). Energy content is the same for both products (1263kJ per serve).

Sponsors

Griffith University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Able to provide informed consent (aged 18 years or older, cognitively intact, able to communicate in English); 2. Able to consume food and thin fluids orally; 3. Expected to stay in hospital for at least 2 days from recruitment; and 4. Inadequate oral intake requiring 2 x standard oral nutrition supplements/ day, as determined by ward dietitian.

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior participation in the study; 2. Dying/palliative; and 3. Contraindications for oral nutrition supplements or study participation, determined by ward dietitian and nurse unit manager or delegate (e.g. eating disorder, uncontrolled diabetes, allergy to ONS ingredients).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026