Skip to content

An investigation of the effectiveness of a therapeutic assessment intervention on engagement in aftercare services for young people who present to the emergency department for deliberate self-harm

Effectiveness of a therapeutic assessment intervention on engagement in aftercare services for young people who present to the emergency department for deliberate self-harm

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12622001420730
Enrollment
394
Registered
2022-11-07
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2022-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the TA intervention in young people who present to the ED for DSH or suicidal ideation with past DSH behaviour. The results of this project will be used to determine whether TA is effective in adherence to aftercare services and repeat presentations to the ED for DSH. The objectives are to: 1) To examine the effectiveness of the TA intervention on adherence to aftercare services at 6-months and 12-months post-presentation to the ED for DSH, including young people who present with suicidal ideation with a history of DSH. 2) To examine the effectiveness of the TA intervention on reducing rates of re-presentations to the ED for DSH or suicidal ideation at 6-months and 12-months post-presentation. 3) To identify key modifiable factors associated with access and availability of aftercare services for young people post presentation to ED for DSH or suicidal ideation with a history of DSH, in metropolitan and regional settings.

Interventions

This project will involve the delivery of a brief collaborative intervention called the Therapeutic Assessment (TA) to young people aged 12-17 years who present to the emergency department (ED) for deliberate self-harm (DSH) at the following sites: 1) Perth Children’s Hospital ED 2) Albany Health Campus ED 3) Geraldton Regional Hospital ED The TA is a brief psychological intervention that has been designed to make the assessment of young people who have engaged in DSH behaviour more therape

This project will involve the delivery of a brief collaborative intervention called the Therapeutic Assessment (TA) to young people aged 12-17 years who present to the emergency department (ED) for deliberate self-harm (DSH) at the following sites: 1) Perth Children’s Hospital ED 2) Albany Health Campus ED 3) Geraldton Regional Hospital ED The TA is a brief psychological intervention that has been designed to make the assessment of young people who have engaged in DSH behaviour more therapeutic (Ougrin et al., 2011). TA builds upon standard clinical assessment to identify factors that drive and maintain DSH behaviour. TA involves brief recovery-focused problem-solving therapy to identity the young person’s strengths and uses this to encourage help-seeking behaviours. The major components of Therapeutic Assessment are as follows: 1) Standard psychosocial history and risk assessment (approximately 1 hr) completed by Psychiatric Liason Nurses (PLN) 4-hours of presentation to the ED per the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) protocol. 2) A 45 min intervention completed bt the PLN nurse within 7-days of presenting to the ED for DSH. Participants will be given the option to attend the assessment at the hospital or online through teleconferencing. The TA intervention includes: a) Joint construction of a diagram aiming to capture the vicious cycles that maintain DSH. b) Identifying a target problem contributing to the patients DSH. c) Considering and enhancing motivation for change. d) Exploring potential ‘exits’ (i.e., ways of breaking the cycles of DSH identified during the intervention). e) Describing the diagram and the exits in an ‘understanding letter’ which the clinician is required to prepare based on the initial assessment. The understanding letter outlines the primary concerns identified by the young person during the TA intervention. It includes a copy of the diagram including the coping strategies identified during the TA. The understanding letter is a tool that the young person can draw on during their recovery and offers a secondary source of support to the young person. The study will occur over 34-months and will be split into two time periods with a two-month gap at months 11-12 to allow for training of staff at each participating trial site. Period 1 comprises months 1-10. Participants who present to participating trial sites during Period 1 will be enrolled into Group 1 and will receive standard clinical care. Each participant will receive follow-up at 6-months and 12 months. During the training period (months 11-12) staff will be trained in the TA assessment at each participating trial site. During the training period there will be no further recruitment of participants. Young people who present to participating EDs during this time for an index event of DSH will not be eligible to participate in the study. Period 2 comprised months 13-22. Participants who present to participating trial sites during Period 2 will be enrolled into Group 2 and will receive the TA intervention. Each participant will receive follow-up at 6-months and 12 months from their index presentation. Training The training package for TA will be based upon the two-full day routinely delivered training package, delivered in person via face-to-face workshops by a trained clinical psychologist. Training will consist of 5 half-day seminars including theoretical background, viewing clinical videos of TA being delivered, followed by completing two TA interventions directly supervised by PI Pedro with agreeable, eligible but non-participating patients within the final two weeks of the Training and Implementation Phase. Ongoing clinical supervision will allow for continuity of support. Clinical supervision will occur weekly for 1.5 hours for the duration of the trial. Model Fidelity Model fidelity will be based on the procedures used by Ougrin and colleagues for the clinical trial of TA (Ougrin et al., 2011). Initial fidelity will be established during the final two weeks of the training phase. Post-completion of the training package and directly supervised interventions on two occasions, clinicians will complete a further two interventions with agreeable, eligible but non-participating patients during the Training and Implementation phase. Standard clinical delivery of TA requires written transcript of the interview, including co-construction of the model and 'Exits' on a standardised proforma. These written transcripts and the accompanying 'Therapeutic Letter' will be de-identified and submitted for external review against the Therapeutic Assessment quality assurance tool (TAQAT). Fidelity audits will be completed by a combination of an external auditor, a participant and the clinician delivering the intervention. Audit outcomes will be reviewed during clinical supervision. Fidelity will also be supported via weekly clinical supervision sessions. Ongoing fidelity will be monitored throughout the intervention via monthly audits of randomly selected, de-identified transcripts and Therapeutic Letters. Fidelity will also be supported via weekly clinical supervision sessions.

Sponsors

Telethon Kids Institute
Lead SponsorCharities/Societies/Foundations

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Other
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
12 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Young people aged 12-17 years of age who attend Perth Children’s Hospital, Albany Health Campus or Geraldton Regional Hospital EDs for DSH (defined as intentional self-injury or poisoning, irrespective of suicidal intent) OR young people who present for suicidal ideation with a history of DSH.

Exclusion criteria

1) The young person presents with suicidal ideation but has no current or historical DSH behaviour. 2) Current psychosis as documented in Department of Health Progress notes or reported by parents/carer or clinicians. 3) Intellectual disability (IQ score <70) as documented in Department of Health Progress notes or reported by parents/carers. 4) Parent/carer lack of consent. 5) Patient lack of verbal consent (patient chooses not to participate). 6) Lack of concordance for consent between parent/carer and patient.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026