Skip to content

The use of Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain in Patients with Bone Metastasis: a cohort study

The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain in Patients with Bone Metastasis: A descriptive cohort study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12622000853741
Enrollment
140
Registered
2022-06-16
Start date
2021-01-10
Completion date
2022-02-21
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Bone metastasis often results in disabling pain. A standardized evaluation of the pain characteristics and associations may assist in achieving stable pain control. This study required a single 1-hour face-face or telehealth interview using validated tools to assess adult cancer patients with bone metastasis. A description of the pain features and characteristics and their association with opioid consumption will be reported.

Interventions

This study involves a single cross-sectional survey of cancer patients with bone metastasis to assess the five different components of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECSCP):pain mechanism, incident pain, addictive behaviour, psychological distress and cognitive impairment. Each survey will take an average of 1-hour to complete. Pain mechanism was determined clinically by palliative care physician/specialist through a face-face or telehealth history and/or examination. Incide

This study involves a single cross-sectional survey of cancer patients with bone metastasis to assess the five different components of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECSCP):pain mechanism, incident pain, addictive behaviour, psychological distress and cognitive impairment. Each survey will take an average of 1-hour to complete. Pain mechanism was determined clinically by palliative care physician/specialist through a face-face or telehealth history and/or examination. Incident pain was documented using the Breakthrough pain assessment tool (BAT). Evidence of addictive behaviour was considered present if a patient score one or greater using the Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty and Eye-opener questionnaire adapted to include drugs (CAGE-AID). Cognitive function was assessed using the Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test (SOMCT) with score of 0-8: normal-minimum, 9-19: minimal to moderate and 20-28: severe cognitive impairment. Psychological distress was determined as present when scored four or greater using the Distress Thermometer (score range from 0-10). In addition to the ECS-CP features above, pain intensity scores were measured using the 11-point numeric rating scale with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing worse pain imaginable. Pharmacological pain management, including background opioid in oral morphine equivalent daily dose (OMEDD) and daily frequency of breakthrough opioid analgesia requirement were obtained from the participants directly or through the inpatient electronic Medication Management chart.

Sponsors

Dr Merlina Sulistio
Lead SponsorIndividual

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(a) adults >/=18 years of age with a diagnosis of solid tumour or haematological malignancy, (b) confirmation of bone metastasis on imaging

Exclusion criteria

unable to complete clinical assessment due to (a) language barrier, (b) significant cognitive impairment or mental health condition, and (c) too unwell to participate in the study as determined by the patient’s treating physician.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026