None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of the current study is to conduct a Feasibility Trial (FT) for a treatment intervention involving parents of children and young adolescents with a screen-based disorder, or with problematic patterns of screen use. Parents of children and adolescents identified as “at risk” of Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) or Problematic Screen Use will be invited to take part in the FT. Hypotheses: 1. Given that it is expected a number of parents will not be able to implement the program for the full 6 weeks, it is expected that those who complete will have better results than those who partially complete. That is, that parents who are able to implement the treatment model for all 6 weeks post intervention, compared to those parents who implemented strategies for under 2 weeks and those who implemented them for between 3-6 weeks, will report a greater decrease in child screen use and significantly stronger improvement in their child’s wellbeing as measured by reduced family conflict, improved behaviour, sleep, exercise, social engagement with peers and schoolwork. 2. That children with high levels of Internet Gaming as measured by clinically significant score on the IGD-10 (5+) and/or high/problematic levels on the IGD-10, SABAS and BSMAS (24+) prior to intervention, will report an initial increase in family conflict followed by a steady reduction once the parent strategies are in place. 3. That the parenting intervention strategies employed by the active treatment group will be more effective in the younger sample than in the teenage sample. This hypothesis is based on previous research (Marshall et al., 2022) where we found preliminary evidence for increased IGD symptoms after children start high school and on the basis that teenagers are individuating and therefore less likely to willingly comply with parent rules than primary school children. 4. That parenting strategies will be more effective for children that have ‘at risk’ or sub-clinical presentations rather than clinical levels of IGD/GD, as children and teenagers who meet criteria the full clinical disorder criteria may be more resistant to intervention, more ‘driven’ by the “addiction”, and potentially lacking insight into their disorder. 5. That participants whose parents receive the text message ‘nudge’ will maintain treatment gains longer and/or more consistently than participants who do not.
Interventions
Treatment Group Participants will receive access to a series of short parent education video modules delivered by Brad Marshall (co-author of this study and Registered Psychologist). Part One of the series will provide psychoeducation around screen addiction and identify psychological “underpinnings” associated with overuse. Part Two outlines the seven-step model for parent intervention outlined in the parenting book The Tech Diet for your Child and Teen (Marshall, 2019). These strategies involve parents focusing on managing WIFI connection to devices as opposed to traditional advice on "taking" a physical screen. The strategies also outline how to negotiate and agree on a WIFI screen daily plan with their child. In the first two weeks parents are asked to watch the video series that is approximately 90 minutes in length and platform that hosts the video series tracks whether a participant has watched the video which allows for measuring treatment compliance. Parents will then be asked to implement these strategies at home over a 6-week period.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
All participants in this study will be invited post a school based screening questionnaire from a earlier study. This will identify "at risk and clinical" levels of screen and gaming use, and invite those parents to participate.
Exclusion criteria
Any child who displays clinical levels of co-morbid psychopathology (Depression, Anxiety etc) will be excluded if they are not currently under the care of a health practitioner able to monitor their mental state during this program,