Skip to content

Benchmarking for healthy stores in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities

Benchmarking for healthy stores in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities: Assessing the feasibility and effectiveness of an innovative benchmarking approach

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12622000596707
Enrollment
32
Registered
2022-04-21
Start date
2022-07-29
Completion date
2022-07-29
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

How food is promoted, priced and made available in food retail has considerable impact on consumer behaviour and subsequently population health. In partnership with government and Aboriginal health services, the remote retail sector and policy-makers, we will codesign and test the feasibility and effectiveness of an innovative benchmarking approach to support the uptake of health-enabling best-evidence practice and policy by stores in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, and identify the pathway to set this benchmarking into policy. We will test feasibility of the benchmarking model through partner organisations who work with community stores in the Northern Territory (NT) and extend our research to include stakeholders from Western Australia (WA), Queensland (QLD) and South Australia (SA) to assess its scalability.

Interventions

The intervention comprises two full benchmarking cycles (one per year) each with four segments: 1. Benchmarking assessment of i) best-practice store policy action, ii) implementation of best-practice, iii) healthiness of customer purchasing; iv) level of influence of enabling/impeding factors; 2. Benchmarking assessment visual report with recommendations provided to storeowners; 3. Report and recommendations discussed with storeowners and 4. codesign of action plan. The duration of a full benchm

The intervention comprises two full benchmarking cycles (one per year) each with four segments: 1. Benchmarking assessment of i) best-practice store policy action, ii) implementation of best-practice, iii) healthiness of customer purchasing; iv) level of influence of enabling/impeding factors; 2. Benchmarking assessment visual report with recommendations provided to storeowners; 3. Report and recommendations discussed with storeowners and 4. codesign of action plan. The duration of a full benchmarking cycle is 52 weeks. Benchmarking assessment will occur for each store within the months of July/August of each year. Provision of benchmarking assessment reports and co-design of action plan will occur for each store within the months of Nov/Dec of each year. Storeowners/managers will be responsible for implementation of the action plan until Nov/Dec of the following year when a second action plan will be codesigned and implemented. Benchmarking assessment of i) best-practice store policy action, ii) implementation of best-practice, iii) healthiness of customer purchasing; iv) level of influence of enabling/impeding factors will be assessed by a dietitian or member of the research team with input from the storeowner/manager. The benchmarking visual report with recommendations will be provided to storeowners via email by a dietitian or a member of the research team. A dietitian or member of the research team will discuss the recommendations and codesign an action plan with store representative/s. The Benchmarking assessment of best-practice store policy action is anticipated to take approximately 30mins to complete using a policy action audit tool. Benchmarking assessment of implementation of best-practice is anticipated to take 40-60mins to complete by a dietitian or member of the research team using an App, called Store Scout App. Benchmarking assessment of the healthiness of customer purchasing will be done by the research team using store sales reports. Assessment of level of influence of enabling/impeding factors will be done by a store representative using an e-survey and is anticipated to take approximately 30mins. Provision and discussion of benchmarking visual report with recommendations to store representatives and codesign of action plan is anticipated to take 60-90mins. The codesign process involves a single 60-90 min workshop either face-to-face in-store or via videoconference between a store representative and a dietitian and/or member of the research team. The strategies that may be employed as part of the action plan include 'No price promotions on discretionary food and drink products', 'Price discounts on fruit and vegetables', 'No discretionary food and drink products in highly visible/high traffic areas of the store including front-of-store, check-outs, end-of-aisle caps'. Adherence to the benchmarking intervention will be monitored via interview with the dietitian or member of the research team at the end of each benchmarking cycle.

Sponsors

Monash University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

A food retail outlet in the Northern Territory of Australia, that is primarily a grocery store and services a remote community that has a primarily Aboriginal population, is able to be approached at the time of recruitment and has a store board/owner and/or is serviced by a retail organisation area manager who have shown interest in the study and/or engaged with nutrition initiatives, there is a public health nutrition service provided by a partner organisation

Exclusion criteria

The food retail outlet is a roadhouse, cafe or club (i.e., not primarily a grocery store); food retail business reason for being unable to recruit (e.g., civil unrest, financial difficulties)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026