Skip to content

Randomized controlled trial to compare functional outcomes between LOcking compression Plates and Retrograde Intramedullary Nails in distal femur fractures

Randomized controlled trial to compare functional outcomes between LOcking compression Plates and Retrograde Intramedullary Nails in distal femur fractures

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12622000229774
Acronym
LOPRIN
Enrollment
96
Registered
2022-02-09
Start date
2022-07-01
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The estimated frequency of distal femur fractures is 0.4% of all fractures and 3% of femur fractures. They have a bimodal distribution, with low energy fractures occurring in the elderly, while high energy distal femur fractures occur in young population. The treatment of these injuries is still debated. Current treatment options include extramedullary locking compression plates (LCP) and retrograde intramedullary nails (RIMN). The functional outcome at 6 months using retrograde intramedullary nail (RIMN) is different than Locking compression plate (LCP) in the treatment of extra-articular distal femur fractures, based on Wilde's modification of the Neer knee score.

Interventions

The treatment under investigation is retrograde intramedullary nailing. RIMN requires less extensive dissection and in a biomechanical study comparing RIMN with LCP and dynamic condylar screw, RIMN was found to have greatest stability for type 33A fractures. This method is routinely used for the stabilization of femoral fractures, including distal extraarticular ones. A 3- to 4-cm incision is done through either a tendon split or a parapatellar arthrotomy. The nail is inserted in the intercond

The treatment under investigation is retrograde intramedullary nailing. RIMN requires less extensive dissection and in a biomechanical study comparing RIMN with LCP and dynamic condylar screw, RIMN was found to have greatest stability for type 33A fractures. This method is routinely used for the stabilization of femoral fractures, including distal extraarticular ones. A 3- to 4-cm incision is done through either a tendon split or a parapatellar arthrotomy. The nail is inserted in the intercondylar notch just anterior to the femoral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Then a guide pin is inserted in line with the femoral shaft to ensure restoration of coronal plane alignment on both radiographic views. Next the entry reamer is used to open the metaphyseal segment. Cannulated soft tissue sleeves are used to prevent injury to the patellar tendon and articular surface of the patella. Once the fracture is reduced, the guide pin is inserted into the medullary canal, as far as approximately 12-14 cm proximal to the fracture zone. Reaming is done. Then drive the nail over the guide pin after confirmation of size and diameter of the nail. For retrograde femoral nailing to achieve adequate fracture stabilization, the fracture should be at least 6 cm from the joint line to achieve distal locking with screws. Distally, fix both screw holes, while proximally use one screw hole for fixation. Before the wound closure, perform thorough irrigation of the knee wound in order to minimize the risk of infection and to remove any debris from the joint. End the procedure with the closure of the tendon (as necessary), the deep tissues and the skin. Orthopedic surgeon will perform the intervention and the process will take around 45 min to 1 hour. Study schedule and randomization process will be diligently followed according to the study protocol. Every eligible patient will be randomly allocated to either LCP or RIMN. The randomization list will be prepared using software by an independent researcher using random block sizes of 2, 4 and 6. This randomization list will not be available to those who enrol participants (study team members) or assign interventions (treating physician) to maintain concealment. Once the patient is in the operating theatre and is given anaesthesia for surgery, a telephone call will be made to the independent researcher to ask for the treatment allocation. Neither the patient nor the surgeon can be blinded due to the difference in implants and wound patterns. Assessor(s)=physiotherapists will be blinded by covering the knees of the patient during assessment of functional score.

Sponsors

Syed Imran Bukhari
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

• Patients equal to or more than 18 years • ASA grade 1-3 • Diagnosis of closed extra-articular distal femur fracture type 33A2/3 • Fracture requiring operative treatment amenable to either Retrograde Intramedullary nail (RIMN) or Locking compression plate (LCP) • Surgical treatment within 7 days after injury • Informed consent obtained, i.e.: o Ability to understand the content of the patient information/ informed consent form (ICF) o Willingness and ability to participate in the clinical investigation according to the Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP) o Signed and dated ethics committee (EC)/ institutional review board (IRB) approved written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

• Pathological fractures • Peri-prosthetic fractures • Poor skin condition overlying skin incision • Pre-existing knee arthritis • Unfit for anesthesia • Fractures with vascular injury requiring repair • Retained hardware or existing deformity in the affected limb that would complicate IM nailing or plating • Soft tissue injuries compromising treatment method with either nail or plate • Diagnosed metabolic bone disease • Mentally incompetent patients (a person who cannot make or carry out important decisions regarding his or her affairs). • Recent history of substance abuse (i.e. recreational drugs, alcohol) that would preclude reliable assessment • Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present study

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026