Skip to content

Piloting a multicomponent frailty management program for community-dwelling older adults in Singapore

Effectiveness of a multicomponent frailty management program among community-dwelling older adults in Singapore: A pilot-controlled trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12621001686897
Enrollment
23
Registered
2021-12-09
Start date
2019-03-21
Completion date
2019-04-30
Last updated
2021-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

With the increasing ageing population worldwide, the prevalence of frailty is likely to rise. In Singapore, the prevalence of pre-frailty and frailty among local community-dwelling older adults were 37% and 6.2% respectively. Several studies have identified the effectiveness of a multicomponent frailty management program, but limited studies were done in Singapore. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a multicomponent frailty management program (mFMP) in reducing frailty status among community-frail older adults in Singapore. A non-randomised controlled trial was conducted. Sixteen out of 23 participants completed the 12-week programs. Pre-post assessments were conducted to compare the differences in physical and psychological functions between the mFMP (Experimental Group) and a fitness program (Control Group) in 12-week and 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the Clinical Frailty Scale score. It was hypothesized that the multicomponent program was more effective in reducing frailty and its adverse consequences. Results of the study would provide insights on the feasibility and effectiveness of such a program which may be implemented in Singapore for older people at risk of frailty.

Interventions

A non-randomised controlled trial involving a 12-week intervention, 1-month and 3-month post-intervention follow-ups were conducted at two community sites. Participants were allocated to either an experimental group (EG) or a control group (CG) at different sites according to their personal preferences without randomisation. Participants in the experimental group underwent a multicomponent frailty management program (mFMP) facilitated by a programme leader who is an allied health professional.

A non-randomised controlled trial involving a 12-week intervention, 1-month and 3-month post-intervention follow-ups were conducted at two community sites. Participants were allocated to either an experimental group (EG) or a control group (CG) at different sites according to their personal preferences without randomisation. Participants in the experimental group underwent a multicomponent frailty management program (mFMP) facilitated by a programme leader who is an allied health professional. The program consisted of 12 weekly sessions and was conducted in a small group setting (n=10-14). Each weekly session consisted of a 1-hour sharing session on topics relating to frailty (e.g. energy conservation technique, healthy diet, medication, chronic disease management, fall prevention and community participation) by different healthcare professionals, such as the dietician, pharmacist, physiotherapist and occupational therapist. This was followed by 15 minutes tea break and another 45 minutes of physical exercises targeting balance (e.g. sit-to-stand, tandem stand), strength (e.g. arm strengthening, leg raise, heel raise, side hip strengthening) and endurance (e.g. daily walking) conducted by the program leader. Homework including strength and balance exercises and various content topics were assigned to participants. Weekly homework sheets including the individualized sets of exercises were given to each participant and checked by the program leader weekly. All exercises were mild intensity adapted from the Otago Exercise Program and ViviFrail.com. Participants were recommended to do the strength exercises 3-4 times per week and balance exercises daily. The exercise specialist and program facilitator will upgrade the intensity level when individual participants progress during the 12-week intervention. Individual goals were explored and discussed at the start of the program and reviewed upon completion of the program by the program leader. A 2-hour booster session was conducted to recap the program contents (including exercises) at 1-month post-intervention. During the booster session, participants shared their goal achievements, their strategy implementation and challenges. Professional advice and relevant community resources were provided to the participants by the program leader. A 20-minute phone call follow-up was conducted at 3-month post-intervention. Similar to the booster session, participants shared their goal achievements, strategy implementation and challenges and future plans. As part of the feasibility study, participants’ weekly attendance will be recorded and homework were checked by the program leader to assess their compliances.

Sponsors

Singapore Institute of Technology
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Educational / counselling / training

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria - Aged 65 and above - Able to ambulate independently with or without a walking aid - Living at home - Clinical Frailty Scale scored between 4-6

Exclusion criteria

- cognitive impairment with Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) scores < 6; - major depression or other psychological disorders; - severe audio-visual impairment; - existing major mobility limitation with Short Performance Physical Battery scores < 3 or unable to complete 4-metre walk test component; - unable to understand English or Mandarin; having a terminal illness with a life expectancy < 12 months.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026