None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The overall aim of this study is to assess the effects of cognitively demanding resistance training breaks in secondary school classrooms. More specifically, this study will assess the effect of cognitively demanding classroom resistance training breaks on adolescents' executive function, on task behaviour and muscular fitness. The majority of research in physical activity and cognition has investigated the quantitative aspects of physical activity, such as duration and intensity. Alternatively, the qualitative characteristics of physical activity, such as task complexity, novelty and activity context, have received less attention. Emerging research on cognitively demanding physical activity, using the qualitative characteristics of physical activity, seems to promote changes in executive functions. The outcomes from this research will benefit current and future generations of young Australians as physical activity levels decline dramatically during adolescence, and only 15% of Australian adolescents are sufficiently active. Finding ways to promote physical activity in adolescents is particularly important considering that physical inactivity is linked with a range of diseases such as obesity, Type II diabetes, and a range of mental health disorders. Of note, stress and anxiety among youth are increasing in recent decades, particularly among older adolescents. Schools are ideal settings for the promotion of physical activity because they have the necessary facilities, equipment, personnel and are accessible to young people. Our proposed study, focusing on the promotion of physical activity for adolescents has the potential to create new knowledge and reduce the burden of physical inactivity. This project will offer a significant contribution to the field by emphasising the impact of cognitive demanding physical activity.
Interventions
Brief name: Investigating the impact of cognitively demanding resistance training breaks. Why: To gain further understanding on the topic of physical activity breaks combined with varying levels of associated cognitive demand to a) executive function b) on-task behaviour and c) muscular fitness. What: This is a four arm randomised control trial and there are 3 different intervention groups which will be provided with 3 different intervention videos each lasting 6-8 minutes and set to a Tabata format of 20sec on/ 10sec off x 8 sets; a total workout time of 4 minutes: a) The High activity/High cognitive demand group (HAHC) respond to the stimulus by performing the correlating resistance training exercise (e.g. 1 session totals 32 x 5 seconds of resistance training activities). Examples of body weight exercises included in the intervention are: table push ups, squats to a chair, tricep dips on a chair. An example of a video that will be used in the intervention can be seen here - https://drive.google.com/file/d/16zkKk1dK3TfZ4n933E07dOlhl9vbmsK3/view?usp=sharing b) The High activity/Low cognitive demand group (HALC) complete the same resistance training exercises but require no cognitive demand, rather simply copy the performer on the video. An example of a video that will be used in the intervention can be seen here - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-P9Q1GAEpqpOHOBUE7Opi7G8UezWazlM/view?usp=sharing c) The Low physical activity/High cognitive demand (LAHC) respond to the stimulus by selecting an image on the response wheel on their desk in front of them. An example of a video that will be used in the intervention can be seen here - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wlvWQU7Nl0vFzQqHj_CTqUlJY-i4wT5d/view?usp=sharing Who provided: The video was produced by working with experts from the fitness industry, specifically strength trainers with expertise in delivering resistance training activities to adolescents. At the point of delivery, it will be classroom teachers who play the video to the class and supervise the safety of their students. A 3 hour training session is delivered to all teachers involved in the study where key elements of safety, motivation and technique are explained. The procedure for delivery is for students to enter the classroom and place their bag safely out of the way (this is clearly indicated on a safety video at the beginning of the study). The teacher will then ask the class if any students are unwell or suffering from an injury. At this point, the teacher makes a decision based on outlined scenarios discussed in training to either modify the student's workload or exempt them from that session. The video is then played and students participate in the workout. The Tabata style has students exercise for 20 seconds and resting for 10 seconds repeated 8 times. The total video time is 6 minutes. At the completion of the video, students return to their seat and begin class work. How: The intervention is provided to the class of Year 10 students as a group at the beginning of each mathematics lesson for 4 weeks (A total of 12 sessions). Where: The intervention will occur in a standard Highschool mathematics classroom. No movement to furniture is required and students perform all exercises using only the desk and chair. When and how much: Each video lasts for 6-8 minutes with a total workout time of 4 minutes. The video is delivered at the beginning of each mathematics lesson (3 times per week) for a total of 4 weeks. Tailoring: Tailoring can occur for students who are injured. Eg a student with a broken arm can modify exercises to complete another exercise that does not utilise the use of their arm e.g. lunges. All modifications are discussed in the teacher training session. Modifications: No modifications are intended. How well - planned: Planned fidelity checks are to occur weekly by myself - the lead investigator. A structured set of questions outline a fidelity check ensuring continuity to the delivery of the videos across schools.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Students participating in the study must be in year 10 at an NSW high school.
Exclusion criteria
• Any acute or chronic condition that would limit the ability of the patient to participate in the study • Parents have refused to give consent