Skip to content

Comparative efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression and negative pressure therapy on muscle function and soreness. A randomized controlled trial

Comparative efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression and negative pressure therapy on delayed-onset muscle soreness in young, healthy, physically active men. A randomized controlled trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12621001294842
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-09-24
Start date
2018-11-01
Completion date
2019-10-07
Last updated
2021-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The specific aim of this study is to assess if recovery in DOMS syndrome could be accelerated with a use of compression therapy or negative pressure therapy. We hypothesized that therapies would be similarly effective in pain reduction and muscle function improvement. Results will be applicable to athletes and active people. This is the first randomised control trial to evaluate effects of ICT or INPT on muscle fatigue and recovery during DOMS syndrome.

Interventions

All procedures and therapies were conducted in a laboratory setting in the university research centre. Immediately after DOMS induction (5x20 jumps from a box of 60 cm high) participant performed a session of intermittent compression therapy (ICT) or intermittent negative pressure therapy (INPT) or sham microcurrent therapy (Control) for the lower body (legs and pelvis). A duration of 30 minutes was set for all groups. In all groups, therapy was repeated 24 and 48 hours after DOMS induction. All

All procedures and therapies were conducted in a laboratory setting in the university research centre. Immediately after DOMS induction (5x20 jumps from a box of 60 cm high) participant performed a session of intermittent compression therapy (ICT) or intermittent negative pressure therapy (INPT) or sham microcurrent therapy (Control) for the lower body (legs and pelvis). A duration of 30 minutes was set for all groups. In all groups, therapy was repeated 24 and 48 hours after DOMS induction. All therapies sessions were provided by an experienced physiotherapist. INPT was performed by Vacusport Regeneration System (Weyergans LTD, Germany) and ICT was performed by BOA - Max 2 (Metrum CryoFlex, Poland). For INPT, program # 2 was used. The program consisted of five six-minute stages. In the first stage, the ratio of the duration of the vacuum and pause, measured in seconds, was 7: 7 at the turbine power level 8, which corresponded to a vacuum of -33 mbar; in the second, respectively 8: 6 and power 10 (- 37mbar); services 8: 8 and 13 (-43mbar); on the fourth 9: 9 and 15 (- 49mbar); on the fifth 10:10 and power 15 (- 49mbar). For ICT sport massage program was set. The pressure in the ventricles corresponded to the diastolic pressure of the examined patients and was in all cases 70-80 mmHg. The "sports massage" program was selected, consisting in pumping three chambers in each leg simultaneously, starting from the distal parts of the lower limbs. 10 treatment cycles were set, with each cycle time being 3 minutes, a typical gradient and a pace of 15. For the potential increase of the massage effect, the option of a pulsating massage was set, which was activated after the chambers were completely filled. After all 24 chambers were inflated, the machine aspirated these chambers simultaneously and the next cycle began.

Sponsors

Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw Faculty in Biala Podlaska
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
18 Years to 28 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Healthy, moderatey physically active participants. No smoking , no drug taking.

Exclusion criteria

competitive physical activity; sedentary lifestyle; lower limb or spine injuries within a year prior to the study; current inflammations; contraindications to INPT or ICT

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026