Skip to content

Exploring the impact of caseload midwifery on preterm birth among vulnerable and disadvantaged women: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Exploring the impact of caseload midwifery on preterm birth among vulnerable and disadvantaged women: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12621001211853
Acronym
MAGNOLIA (Midwifery CAseload Care – SupportinG Childbearing WomeN: A Randomised ContrOLled TrIAl)
Enrollment
1022
Registered
2021-09-10
Start date
2022-09-06
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Preterm birth is associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. For women who are considered socially disadvantaged, or vulnerable, adverse neonatal outcomes such as preterm birth are substantially poorer than for women who are not from these groups. How perinatal care is provided has the potential to have a major impact on these outcomes. Caseload midwifery, where women receive care from one midwife during pregnancy, labour, birth and postpartum, is associated with improved clinical and psychosocial outcomes among women with low-risk pregnancies. Using a two-arm multi-site randomised controlled trial (RCT) design, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of caseload midwifery care for women identified as being socially vulnerable, compared to usual maternity care, on preterm delivery. Secondary aims of the study include low birthweight (< 2,500 grams); admission to the neonatal intensive care unit; caesarean birth; birth experience; maternal satisfaction with perinatal care; breastfeeding initiation and maintenance; maternal psychological wellbeing; health service use; and cost-effectiveness of the model. The views and experiences of care providers and other key stakeholders will also be explored, and a nested sub-study of physiological stress responses will be conducted at one study site to explore the stress response among women in both trial arms.

Interventions

Women randomised to the caseload intervention will receive antenatal, intrapartum and early postpartum care from a primary caseload midwife (with one or two antenatal visits conducted by a ‘back-up’ midwife if necessary). Women will receive midwifery care as per hospital guidelines and in conjunction with other health providers e.g., Obstetricians, Physicians, Allied Health as required. The number, frequency and duration of antenatal visits will be as per care provision to all maternity consumer

Women randomised to the caseload intervention will receive antenatal, intrapartum and early postpartum care from a primary caseload midwife (with one or two antenatal visits conducted by a ‘back-up’ midwife if necessary). Women will receive midwifery care as per hospital guidelines and in conjunction with other health providers e.g., Obstetricians, Physicians, Allied Health as required. The number, frequency and duration of antenatal visits will be as per care provision to all maternity consumers. The difference will be that, unlike other forms of maternity care, where the woman sees various (mostly unknown) midwives throughout the pregnancy, birth and postpartum periods, primary care provision for women assigned to the trial arm will be from the caseload midwife (with medical input as needed). Women in the intervention arm will also be able to contact their primary midwife (or back-up midwife) 24 hours a day, 7 days per week if needed, and the midwife will be on-call to provide care during the woman’s labour and birth. In the postpartum period, the known caseload midwife will provide postnatal care and feeding support to the woman and her baby in hospital and will visit them in their home on discharge for follow-up care and support. Therefore, women who receive the intervention will be provided with continuity of care from a known midwife throughout pregnancy, labour, birth and postpartum; women assigned to standard care will receive care throughout their pregnancy, labour, birth and postpartum from midwives who are working on that day, who may or may not be known to her. The frequency of visits, content of visits, location of visits will be the same in both arms – care will be otherwise provided according to the same hospital guidelines and protocols for all women. Data regarding the extent to which care was provided by the primary midwife will be collected primarily from the electronic medical record following the birth and from the women via telephone questionnaire at three months postpartum. To assess and compare continuity of carer, women in both trial arms will be asked about the presence of known care providers for labour, birth, postnatal hospital care and for their domiciliary care. All relevant hospital guidelines and protocols will be followed when providing care for women in this study, including, but not limited to the Royal Women’s Hospital guidelines - Labour and Birth and Early Puerperium – Care during 2018 - Standard Antenatal Check 2019 - Antenatal Care Schedule: hospital-led care 2020 - Postnatal Care and Documentation: Mother and Baby 2014 A nested sub-study will also explore the potential for differential physiological stress responses by trial arm at the Royal Women’s Hospital. Consecutively randomised English-speaking women recruited at one site (the Royal Women’s Hospital) will be offered participation to this nested sub-study. Heart rate variability, sAA and sC biomarkers will be measured at baseline (i.e., before 20 weeks of pregnancy) and in later pregnancy (i.e., at 36 weeks gestation). To determine a between-group difference at any single timepoint, 200 women are needed (allocation ratio 1:1) to achieve power of 0.80 and an effect size of 0.4. Allowing for some loss to follow-up, 240 women will be recruited (i.e., 120 women in each arm). Three biomarkers will be measured - a. salivary cortisol, b. salivary alpha-amylase, c. time and frequency domain heart rate variability using an electrocardiogram (ECG) recorder (i.e., Holter monitor). Salivary cortisol concentrations will be calculated (in ng/mL) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Salivary alpha-amylase activity will be assayed using a Kinetic Enzyme Assay Kit. Unstimulated saliva samples will be self-collected by women after waking by passing a cotton swab for each test around the mouth in a circular movement for one minute. Swabs will be provided to women who consent to participate at recruitment and, once self-collected, they will be posted to a laboratory at La Trobe university for processing using a registered post addressed envelope provided by the research team. Samples will be taken by women at 20 and 36 weeks gestation. Time and frequency domain heart rate variability will be measured on site by the research midwife following a scheduled pregnancy check-up (i.e., at recruitment and 36 weeks gestation). The research midwife will take women to a dimly lit, quiet room at the Royal Women’s Hospital for the assay (Room 10G, Chelsea House, 55 Flemington Road). Seated women will be fitted with an ECG recorder (Holter monitor), and asked to remain seated for an initial five minutes (familiarisation), then a further five minutes (rest). A five-minute cognitive test (to provoke a sympathetic autonomic response) will be conducted, then women will be asked to breathe in time to a metronome for five minutes at a rate of 20 breaths per minute (to initiate a parasympathetic response) and then to return to their normal (spontaneous) breathing pattern for five minutes. In total, this assay will take approximately 30 minutes to complete. Differences in salivary cortisol and salivary alpha-amylase concentrations and time and frequency domain heart rate variability between groups will be assessed at both timepoints to determine if there are differential physiological stress responses by trial arm.

Sponsors

La Trobe University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Pregnant women less than 24 weeks gestation, booked as a public patient for maternity care at a study site, and considered to be socially vulnerable. We will take a pragmatic approach to assessing eligibility for social vulnerability using available indicators from the literature that are able to be readily identified at the pregnancy booking visit from a clearly defined list, to ensure recruitment is consistent, and eligibility easily decided. Women with any one (or more) of the following will be eligible: low income (on a government pension), less than 20 years of age (but not less than 14 years of age), unpartnered or living alone, current smoker, homeless, BMI less than 18.5, or greater than or equal to 35.

Exclusion criteria

If the fetus has a known congenital anomaly likely to affect the primary outcome, or multiple pregnancy.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026