Skip to content

Nocebo Hypothesis Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (NH-CBT) for non-epileptic seizures

Nocebo Hypothesis Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (NH-CBT) for non-epileptic seizures: a consecutive case series.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12621000998842
Enrollment
10
Registered
2021-07-29
Start date
2021-10-05
Completion date
2022-04-19
Last updated
2022-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Nocebo Hypothesis – Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (NH-CBT) is based on the theory that non-epileptic seizures are the result of a nocebo effect. After diagnosis of non-epileptic seizures by a neurologist, a psychologist then carefully explains this “nocebo hypothesis” to the participant. The participant then exposes themselves to situations that they believe might trigger their seizures, in a graduated fashion. The lack of subsequent seizure is discussed as further evidence that they do not have epilepsy, that the perceived trigger is not harmful, and that perhaps a subconscious belief was indeed responsible for previous seizures. The study hypothesizes that NH-CBT for non-epileptic seizures is potentially an effective treatment, and aims to gather some preliminary data to support this.

Interventions

As the delivery of a non-epileptic seizure (NES) diagnosis has been demonstrated to lead to full remission of seizures in a substantial minority of people with NES in previous studies (e.g. 14%), participants will be informed of this, and told to contact the lead investigator only if they experience further any seizure activity post-diagnosis delivery. If they do contact the lead investigator, eligible participants will then undergo baseline assessment by an independent assessor (research assis

As the delivery of a non-epileptic seizure (NES) diagnosis has been demonstrated to lead to full remission of seizures in a substantial minority of people with NES in previous studies (e.g. 14%), participants will be informed of this, and told to contact the lead investigator only if they experience further any seizure activity post-diagnosis delivery. If they do contact the lead investigator, eligible participants will then undergo baseline assessment by an independent assessor (research assistant), and asked to start a seizure diary (the format of this will be negotiated with the lead investigator on an individual basis, i.e. paper vs text or phone reporting). As soon as is pragmatically possible after this baseline assessment, they will then receive the first session of Nocebo-Hypothesis Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (NH-CBT) for NES. All therapeutic intervention throughout the study will be delivered by the lead investigator, a clinical psychologist with 26 years clinical experience. This will involve around 90 minutes of psychological assessment, education and treatment (dependent on the participant’s existing knowledge) including the following components: gathering information about participants’ medical history, the onset and course of the seizures, the participant’s understanding of the medical evidence, their personal belief about the causes of their symptoms, and their understanding of the terms ‘subconscious’ and ‘placebo effect’. A psychological formulation is then shared with the participant that incorporates relevant history within a hypothesis that the seizures are caused by a nocebo effect. The aim is to engender in the participant an alternative belief about their symptoms, to challenge the one currently held (e.g. “the doctors have missed something”, “there’s something wrong with my brain”). The treatment will then be paused, and only continued if / when the participant experiences another seizure. The next session will start by assessing the participants’ belief in the “nocebo hypothesis” versus their belief in their originally held view (usually that they have a neurological condition, e.g. epilepsy). If the originally held view is still considered more likely than the “nocebo hypothesis”, then evidence for and against this is discussed. Once the nocebo hypothesis is seen as at least equally more likely than any other cause by the participant, a graded exposure hierarchy is made in collaboration with the participant, where antecedents that the person believes could trigger their seizures are subjectively ranked from ‘most likely’ to ‘least likely’. The person then gradually exposes themselves to those triggers (starting with least likely), having previously been taught some techniques that may help prevent seizures (e.g. distraction, grounding). The lack of subsequent seizure is discussed as further evidence that they do not have epilepsy, that the perceived trigger is not harmful, and that perhaps a subconscious belief was indeed responsible for previous seizures. Throughout treatment, the therapist will intentionally portray as much optimism as possible to the participant about potential recovery, e.g. talking about how many people have got rid of their seizures using NH-CBT. Participants will receive therapy over a period of up to 12 weeks, with the frequency of therapy being guided by the frequency of the seizures (e.g. if the seizure frequency is severe enough to warrant inpatient treatment, then therapy may take place for approximately two hours a day). Total time spent in therapy sessions will be monitored. Therapy will cease when the participant has no perceived triggers that they have not been repeatedly exposed to. If therapy ceases early, and there is a recurrent seizure before the 12 week treatment period is complete, then therapy will reconvene, exposing the person to whatever preceded that most recent seizure, in a graduated fashion whenever possible. Participants will also receive written information about their diagnosis and treatment, outlining the “nocebo hypothesis” regarding non-epileptic seizures, including information about the concept of subconscious processing and the placebo/nocebo effect. There will also be clear description of the treatment. Treatment will predominantly take place at the ISIS Rehabilitation Centre, Wakari Hospital, Dunedin, although there may sometimes be some home and community-based intervention, depending on the participant's perceived triggers.

Sponsors

Dr Matt Richardson
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Single group
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants that will be included in our trial will have to meet the following criteria: • have been assessed by a neurologist including the appropriate medical investigation, and that assessment will have resulted in that neurologist identifying that the participant has had a non-epileptic seizure in the last 8 weeks. • have consented to participate, and report every seizure experienced.

Exclusion criteria

Participants will be excluded from the trial if they meet the following criteria: • they have a diagnosis of Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) • they have a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) with high severity and significant dissociation. • they meet diagnostic criteria for current alcohol/drug dependence. • they require inpatient mental health treatment during the trial. • they receive psychopharmacotherapy and change their treatment regimen at any time between baseline assessment and post-therapy assessment. • according to the clinical judgement of the lead investigator, there are concerns about their ability to participate fully in the trial, e.g. they have active and extensive self-harm, or frequent admissions for inpatient mental health treatment in the last two months. • their English language proficiency is low. • they do not have the capacity to consent to participating in the trial

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026