Skip to content

Investigating the effectiveness of falls prevention alarms in hospitals by removing or reducing their use

Using disinvestment to investigate the effectiveness of mobilisation alarms in a stepped-wedge randomised trial design in tertiary hospitals

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12621000823875
Enrollment
551
Registered
2021-06-28
Start date
2022-10-26
Completion date
2025-09-10
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Mobilisation alarms are a staple in hospitals to prevent falls, but there is uncertain evidence for their effectiveness and they can take up to 11% of all falls prevention management costs. This study aims to produce definitive evidence for their effectiveness. Selected hospital wards will remove or reduce their mobilisation alarms, and the rate of falls and falls-related outcomes will be measured and compared to hospital wards that continue to use the alarms as usual. It is hypothesised that removing or reducing mobilisation alarms will not lead to an increase in falls and falls-related injuries.

Interventions

The intervention will be the elimination or reduction of mobilisation alarms in hospital wards. The use of mobilisation alarms to prevent falls in hospitals have uncertain evidence for their effectiveness, but they are also one of the most frequently used falls prevention strategies that have high costs associated. There will be two arms of intervention: Arm 1 Total elimination of mobilisation alarms on the ward. Arm 2 Reduction of mobilisation alarm use to below 3% on the ward. Eighteen hospita

The intervention will be the elimination or reduction of mobilisation alarms in hospital wards. The use of mobilisation alarms to prevent falls in hospitals have uncertain evidence for their effectiveness, but they are also one of the most frequently used falls prevention strategies that have high costs associated. There will be two arms of intervention: Arm 1 Total elimination of mobilisation alarms on the ward. Arm 2 Reduction of mobilisation alarm use to below 3% on the ward. Eighteen hospital wards will be paired, with one ward in Arm 1 and one ward in Arm 2. The intervention will be administered in a stepped-wedge manner, where all ward pairs begin with usual care, and then begins intervention one pair at a time in a sequential manner on a monthly basis, until all ward pairs are undergoing intervention. The first ward pair will be monitored for 1 month of usual care before beginning intervention. All pairs will stop intervention at the same time, one month after the last pair has began intervention. The first ward pair will have undergone 9 months of intervention, and the last ward pair will have undergone 1 month of intervention. The total period of intervention will be 9 months. At the end of the 9 months, all wards will be able to return to their previous levels of alarms at their own discretion.

Sponsors

Monash University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Other
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Hospital wards with a minimum mobilisation alarm use rate of 3% .

Exclusion criteria

For entry to the intervention group a minimum of 20 beds per ward will be required to ensure sufficient statistical power to examine falls outcomes when making comparisons within this stepped wedge trial / intervention condition. For entry to the control group, there will not be a minimum bed requirement as the primary outcome for this comparison is the proportion of beds with mobilisation alarms in use.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026