Skip to content

Absorbable vs Non-absorbable Sutures in Adults Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release

Comparing pain, scar satisfaction and infection rates in Adults undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release with Absorbable vs Non-absorbable Sutures

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12621000559819
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-05-12
Start date
2021-05-18
Completion date
2021-12-06
Last updated
2021-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Our study aims to find out if absorbable or non-absorbable sutures are better for patient's undergoing carpal tunnel surgery

Interventions

Absorbable sutures (Vicryl Rapide) or Non-absorbable (Nylon) for carpal tunnel skin closure. Each patient will receive both "treatments", one type of suture in each hand, with the first hand being randomised. Surgeries will be performed one at a time, rather than both on the same day (current standard practice). The surgeries will be administered by a consultant orthopedic surgeon for every case (not trainees). At the present moment we have two surgeons on board to participate in the trial. Bo

Absorbable sutures (Vicryl Rapide) or Non-absorbable (Nylon) for carpal tunnel skin closure. Each patient will receive both "treatments", one type of suture in each hand, with the first hand being randomised. Surgeries will be performed one at a time, rather than both on the same day (current standard practice). The surgeries will be administered by a consultant orthopedic surgeon for every case (not trainees). At the present moment we have two surgeons on board to participate in the trial. Both are highly experienced in carpal tunnel surgery. Surgery involves local anesthesia, carpal tunnel release, closure of the skin only (carpal tunnel not closed). Skin sutures are generally interrupted. Each surgeon is required to do the same technique (eg interrupted, mattress) for both suture materials. Most of this is already current standard practice and we do not feel the need to monitor the surgeon. The only part that will be monitored is if the same suture technique was used in each had, and this can easily be established on the 2 week follow-up when sutures are visually inspected by a clinical professional.

Sponsors

Dr. Andrew Muller
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients at Taranaki DHB needing staged bilateral carpal tunnel release

Exclusion criteria

Unable to give informed consent Wound healing issues (eg history of keloid scarring) Concomitant hand surgery

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026