Skip to content

Youth mental health screening in schools and pathways to care for at-risk students

Development and validation of a universal mental health screening tool and follow-up referral system to identify at-risk students in Australian schools

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12621000137897
Enrollment
14323
Registered
2021-02-10
Start date
2021-02-19
Completion date
2021-04-23
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study will develop methods for Australian education systems to help identify young people (aged 9-17) who are struggling with emotional disorders. We will develop an initial screening tool containing measures that will assess emotional disorders, as well as interpersonal relations with family and friends and lifestyle habits, which will be tested in a total of 100 schools. This initial screening tool will be delivered to an "immediate screening" group (n=50 schools) and tested in students in Year 4 through to Year 11 across different school sectors, socioeconomic levels, ages, cultural groups, as well as rural and urban schools. Students identified from their responses to the screener as being at-risk of emotional disorders will be flagged with the school and referred to appropriate pathways to care that we will have identified through input and feedback from students, parents, educators and policy-makers. To validate our screening tool, we will ask students and parents to complete clinical interviews and measures of prior help-seeking and quality of life, and also ask for access to school data on student attendance and academic performance. Using these validators, we will develop from the initial screener a shortened version that has as few items as possible, while being sensitive enough to accurately detect at-risk students. This final screener will be delivered to those in the "immediate screening" group 9 months after the initial screener. It will also be tested using a comparison "delayed screening" group (n=50 schools) to determine whether the screening and care process leads to a greater number of young people with emotional disorders getting the help that they need. Finally, we will measure costs and benefits and will conduct economic modelling to estimate how much these processes can save the Australian community. We will also assess the acceptability of school-based screening from the perspectives of students, parents and schools.

Interventions

Schools (n=100) from a broad range of social, regional and economic areas will be invited to participate in the project. Once schools have volunteered to participate, the schools will be randomly assigned to either receive immediate screening (experimental group; n=50) or delayed screening (control group; delayed by 9 months; n=50). Students in Years 4-11 in the immediate screening group will complete a mental health screening tool, consisting of a series of questions relating to their mental

Schools (n=100) from a broad range of social, regional and economic areas will be invited to participate in the project. Once schools have volunteered to participate, the schools will be randomly assigned to either receive immediate screening (experimental group; n=50) or delayed screening (control group; delayed by 9 months; n=50). Students in Years 4-11 in the immediate screening group will complete a mental health screening tool, consisting of a series of questions relating to their mental health. The screening tool will be delivered through an online survey system (REDCap) during PDHPE/health class at school (overseen by a health/welfare teacher, with the school psychologist available for additional support at the time of screening, should students need it). This initial screening tool will consist of a large pool of items, taken from a range of standard emotional health questionnaires - Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale (SCAS; Spence, 1998), Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale (CALIS; Lyneham et al., 2013), Personal Experiences Checklist – Short Form (PECK-SF; Prinz, Costa, Chervonsky, & Hunt, 2019), RADAR (Child and Youth versions; Burns & Rapee, 2016, 2019), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman, 1997), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS; Johns, 1991), Adolescent Sleep Hygiene Scale (ASHS; LeBourgeois et al., 2005), Child Health Utility instrument (CHU-9D; Stevens, 2008), and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q; Fairburn & Beglin, 2008). This screening tool will take approximately 30 minutes for students to complete. Adherence will be monitored by utilising REDCap website analytics that measure survey commencement and completion (partial or total). Ultimately, this large set of items will be reduced to a small set of the best possible items and will form the final brief screener. We envisage that the final brief screener will take no more than 10 minutes for students to complete. To validate our screening tool, students and parents will be invited to be interviewed by a clinical psychologist using structured diagnostic interviews (the current gold standard for diagnosis of mental health disorders) – we will use the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule, Child and Parent version to diagnose anxiety and mood disorders, which will be augmented with the eating disorders section from the KSADS and self-harm items from the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory. Additionally, parents will be asked to complete an online survey with measures of prior help-seeking, quality of life and attitudes towards acceptability of school screening. We will also ask to access school data on student school attendance and academic performance, as these are known correlates with mental health issues. These will serve as validators to the screening tool so we can assess how accurately our screener identifies at-risk youth. The final brief screener will be developed based on these validators and Item Response Theory analysis. We will identify those students who score in the “at-risk” range on any measure of emotional health problems as soon as possible after screening and communicate this to schools (for students identified as at-risk of suicide or self-harm, identification and communication to schools will be immediate - within 24 hours). School psychologists and welfare teachers will work with identified students and their families to offer pathways to relevant support services, according to the most accepted and approved processes identified by key stakeholders (students, parents, school staff, mental health clinicians, and policy makers). Approximately 9 months later, students in the immediate screening group will complete the final brief screener. At this same time, students allocated to the delayed screening group will complete the final brief screener for the first time. This will allow a direct comparison of the emotional health and professional help-seeking between students whose schools had engaged in the screening and pathways to care process (experimental group) and those whose schools had not engaged in the process (control group). Students in the delayed screening group will complete the screener for a second time approximately 6 months later.

Sponsors

Ron Rapee
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Other
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
9 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

For student participants, inclusion criteria are: * Attendance at a participating school * Students are in Year 4 through to Year 11 For adult participants (parents and school staff), inclusion criteria are: * Involvement in a participating school * Provided opt-in (active) consent to participate * No age limit applies to adult participants - age limits provided below are for student participants.

Exclusion criteria

None

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026